Modeling Reveals How Direct-Acting Antivirals Redirect HBV Capsid Assembly Pathways to Noninfectious Products
Frechette, L. B.; Pradhan, S.; Mohajerani, F.; Perez-Segura, C.; Hadden-Perilla, J. A.; Zlotnick, A.; Hagan, M. F.
Show abstract
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections cause chronic liver disease, resulting in about one million deaths per year, and there is currently no cure. Recent work has shown that a class of small molecules called capsid assembly modulators (CAMs) is promising for treating HBV. CAMs bind to HBV capsid protein subunits and alter their assembly, leading to non-functional and malformed structures rather than functional, closed shells. However, the mechanisms by which CAMs alter capsid assembly pathways remain unclear. Here, we extend a recently-developed kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) model for HBV capsid assembly to simulate how CAMs affect assembly. In the model, CAMs alter assembly by preferentially binding to interfaces between certain quasi-equivalent subunit conformations. Simulations of the model reproduce experimental assembly product distributions. By analyzing assembly trajectories, we clarify the roles of thermodynamics and kinetics in determining assembly products, identify assembly mechanisms, and predict the key intermediates that lead to either capsids or malformed structures. Our findings enhance our fundamental understanding of capsid assembly, help advance the development of CAMs as a treatment for HBV and, more broadly, inform efforts to direct self-assembly pathways toward specific products.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Loop-extruder mediated rigidity can globally order bacterial chromosomes 97%
- A method for extracting effective interactions from Hi-C data with applications to interphase chromosomes and inverted nuclei 96%
- Temporally correlated active forces drive segregation and enhanced dynamics in chromosome polymers 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.