Individual-Specific Gaussian Graphical Models for Heterogeneous Populations with Application to Epigenetic Gene Regulation in Lung Adenocarcinoma
Saha, E.
Show abstract
Inter-patient molecular heterogeneity is a fundamental challenge in precision oncology: population-level multi-omics networks reveal average biology aggregated across the population but obscure individual variations that drive differential clinical outcomes. We introduce SIREN (Sample-specific Inference via Regularized Empirical-Bayes Networks), a method that estimates one partial correlation network per sample across omics layers by combining a population-level empirical Bayes prior with a rank-1 individual-specific update. Since a sample-specific precision matrix cannot be estimated from a single observation, SIREN uses a conjugate Inverse Wishart prior whose mean is the Oracle Approximating Shrinkage estimator, yielding closed-form individual-specific posteriors without MCMC. On simulated heterogeneous populations, SIREN achieves superior edge recovery over population-average methods including OAS, Ledoit-Wolf, and graphical Lasso, while remaining competitive in homogeneous settings. Applied to paired transcriptomic and methylomic profiles from lung adenocarcinoma, SIREN identifies individual-specific gene-methylation regulatory edges that stratify patients by survival in ways population-level analysis cannot, implicating chromatin remodeling and WNT signaling pathways in epigenetic heterogeneity. SIREN is computationally scalable and available as a Python package.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Bayesian inference for copy number intra-tumoral heterogeneity from single-cell RNA-sequencing data 96%
- A Bayesian Approach to Restricted Latent Class Models for Scientifically-Structured Clustering of Multivariate Binary Outcomes 95%
- An Interpretable Bayesian Clustering Approach with Feature Selection for Analyzing Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics Data 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.