Back

One organ, two engines: divergent mitochondrial phenotypes in anterior and posterior crab gills

Rivera-Ingraham, G. A.; Familiar-Lopez, M.; Renshaw, G. M. C.

2026-05-26 physiology
10.64898/2026.05.25.727634 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Gills are multifunctional organs that integrate respiration with homeostasis, including energy demanding processes such as osmoregulation and excretion. In osmoregulating decapod crustaceans, two spatially segregated gill types differ in function, ultrastructure and membrane composition, as well as in their responses to environmental change. Yet mitochondrial function in crab gills remains poorly characterized. Here, for the first time, we used high-resolution respirometry with a substrate-uncoupler-inhibitor titration (SUIT) protocol to characterize the mitochondrial phenotypes in anterior (respiratory) and posterior (osmoregulatory) gills. For this, gill filaments of the shore crab Carcinus maenas were permeabilized for 30 min in a saponin solution (optimized for each tissue at 25 {micro}g or 5 {micro}g saponin {middle dot} mg-1 gill fresh weight for anterior and posterior gills, respectively). Anterior gills exhibited higher leak control ratios (L/P, L/E), consistent with a leak-dominated mitochondrial phenotype that may contribute to redox balance at expense of maximal ATP yield. In contrast, posterior gills, displayed a higher phosphorylation control ratio and tighter coupling (higher Net P), reflecting a tightly-coupled, ATP-producing mitochondrial phenotype, in line with their role in sustaining ATP-intensive activities such as osmoregulation and excretion. Our results revealed that anterior and posterior gills operate as "two engines in one organ": by quantifying how each gill type partitions respiratory capacity between phosphorylation and leak pathways, this study provides a mechanistic framework for understanding how mitochondrial specialization supports functional division of labour within a single organ and contributes to physiological adaptation to dynamically fluctuating marine environments.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.7%
2
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 10%
9.8%
3
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.6%
4
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.6%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 21%
2.5%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
9
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.1%
10
The Journal of Experimental Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
13
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
16
Journal of Comparative Physiology A
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
17
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.7%
18
Acta Physiologica
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
19
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.4%
20
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.4%
21
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
Frontiers in Marine Science
62 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
23
npj Microgravity
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
24
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
25
Biology Letters
76 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
26
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
27
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
28
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
29
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
30
Function
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%