Back

Brain-State-Resolved Consistency of Corticospinal Responses with EEG-TMS

van Hattem, T.; Hougland, J. R.; Ahola, O.; Goetz, S. M.; Humaidan, D.; Jooss, A.; Ziemann, U.

2026-05-28 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.25.727597 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) elicits motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), a neurophysiological marker of corticospinal excitability. Ongoing brain activity at the time of stimulation, such as the phase and power of the sensorimotor mu rhythm (8-13 Hz), has a significant impact on MEP amplitudes. However, it remains unclear whether these endogenous excitability states also influence the consistency of MEP amplitudes across repeated trials. ObjectivesWe investigated whether instantaneous mu dynamics modulate not only the magnitude but also the consistency of corticospinal responses to TMS. MethodsTwenty-nine healthy participants received 1200 single TMS pulses over the left M1 during simultaneous EEG recording. Trials were stratified based on pre-stimulus mu power, phase, and interhemispheric M1-M1 functional connectivity. Brain-state-resolved MEP variability was quantified using the coefficient of variation (CV) within subsets of trials defined by similar pre-stimulus mu dynamics. ResultsTrial subsets characterized by high mu power or high M1-M1 functional connectivity were associated with reduced MEP variability, indicating more consistent corticospinal output. In contrast, the mu phase did not significantly influence response consistency. Brain-state-resolved MEP variability showed greater stability across sessions compared to MEP variability estimated from random trial subsampling. ConclusionsPre-stimulus mu dynamics shape not only magnitude but also consistency of corticospinal responses to TMS. We show that corticospinal response consistency reflects a structured, brain-state-dependent property of the sensorimotor network. These findings contribute to our mechanistic understanding of brain-state-dependent neuromodulation and may be leveraged to reduce variability and improve efficacy to TMS. HighlightsO_LIOngoing sensorimotor mu dynamics shape both magnitude and consistency of MEPs. C_LIO_LITrial subsets characterized by high mu power were associated with reduced MEP variability. C_LIO_LIMu phase modulated MEP amplitude but did not influence MEP consistency. C_LIO_LIBrain-state-resolved estimates of MEP variability were more reliable across sessions. C_LIO_LIFuture TMS protocols may reduce effect variability by targeting stable excitability states. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.7%
2
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
3
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
5
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
6
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
7
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.9%
8
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
9
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
10
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
11
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.8%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
13
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
15
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
16
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
18
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
19
Brain Topography
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
20
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
22
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
26
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%