Back

Genomic Diagnostics for Drug-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Computational Prediction of Antimicrobial Resistance

Serajian, M.; Han, Y.; Boucher, C. A.

2026-05-25 microbiology
10.64898/2026.05.25.727578 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a leading cause of infectious disease mortality, and the continued emergence of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) strains threatens the effectiveness of standard treatment regimens. Culture-based antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) remains the clinical reference standard for resistance determination but typically requires six to eight weeks, delaying initiation of optimized therapy for patients with drug-resistant disease. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS)-based approaches provide a rapid alternative for predicting antimicrobial resistance directly from genomic data and are increasingly being incorporated into diagnostic workflows. This survey reviews computational approaches for genomic resistance prediction in MTB, focusing on two major classes of methods: catalog-based tools that identify established resistance-conferring variants, and de novo machine learning approaches that infer resistance from genome-wide sequence features. We examine the strengths and limitations of these approaches with respect to interpretability, scalability, computational requirements, and concordance with phenotypic testing. We further discuss emerging directions in quantitative minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) prediction, challenges in pyrazinamide susceptibility testing, and the limited availability of resistant isolates for newer and repurposed drugs used in multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB) treatment regimens. Continued expansion of paired phenotypic and genomic datasets, standardized MIC testing protocols, and rigorous lineage-aware evaluation frameworks will be essential for improving the clinical reliability and global deployment of genomic resistance prediction for tuberculosis diagnostics.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.7%
2
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.4%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.3%
4
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
7
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
9
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
10
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
11
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
12
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
15
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
ACS Infectious Diseases
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
17
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
19
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.9%
20
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Tuberculosis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.8%
23
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
25
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.7%
26
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
27
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
28
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%