Back

Chemoinformatics-guided discovery of food-grade anionic stabilizers for phycocyanin under acidic conditions

law, l.; Chuang, K.; Luo, L.

2026-05-27 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.05.25.727568 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Phycocyanin (PC) is the principal natural blue pigment used in functional beverages, but it rapidly loses color and aggregates under acidic conditions (pH {approx} 3). Experimental screening of stabilizers is costly and combinatorially intractable. Here we develop a chemoinformatics framework -- descriptor-based QSPR, a chemistry-prior heuristic, and virtual screening -- that learns from three rounds of commissioned screening (48 compounds, 6% hit rate) to predict stabilizer efficacy directly from molecular structure. In this genuinely small-data regime (3 positives), a LightGBM classifier built from 10 RDKit descriptors and 11 domain-expert charge/polymer features attained a leave-one-out AUC of 0.73, only marginally above a single-feature charge-density baseline (AUC 0.67); LOO sensitivity was 1/3 at threshold 0.5. A complementary chemistry-prior heuristic encoding anion-type priors substantially outperformed both, reaching AUC 0.95, indicating that explicit chemical knowledge captures information that descriptor-based ML cannot readily recover at this dataset size. SHAP analysis of the QSPR identified effective negative-charge density per unit, log molecular weight, polyphosphate identity, and functional-group density as the dominant features (jointly {approx}97% of mean |SHAP|), recovering the electrostatic-complexation mechanism without it being supplied as a prior. Virtual screening of 30 generally recognized as safe (GRAS) food additives nominated the pyrophosphate family -- led by sodium pyrophosphate decahydrate and sodium hexametaphosphate (SHMP), both at P {approx} 0.99 -- and the heuristic additionally flagged sodium phytate (IP{square}), which the descriptor model under-ranked at P = 0.045. Experimental validation at pH 3 and 46 {degrees}C for 7 days confirmed SHMP 2:1 (78.1 {+/-} 11.3% color retention), TSPP 2:1 (54.1 {+/-} 10.6%) and IP{square} 1:1 (52.7 {+/-} 9.0%), while a ternary IP{square} + STPP combination reached 83.8 {+/-} 11.9%, surpassing all single-component formulations. {zeta}-Potential measurements indicated a predominantly electrostatic origin for the protection (Pearson r = -0.82 between {zeta} and CR{square} {square} {square}; n = 24; p = 1 x 10{square} {square}). The framework, dataset and code are released to accelerate stabilizer discovery for other acid-sensitive food colorants and to provide a candid small-data benchmark.

Matching journals

The top 14 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.1%
3
Food Chemistry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.7%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.6%
5
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
76 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
6
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
7
Biomacromolecules
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
8
Chemical Science
73 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.2%
9
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
10
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.8%
12
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
13
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
14
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.6%
50% of probability mass above
15
ACS Applied Bio Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
16
Molecules
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
17
Pharmaceutics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
18
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Chemistry
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
21
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
22
RSC Advances
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
23
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
24
ChemMedChem
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
25
Biomaterials Science
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
26
Journal of Controlled Release
44 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
27
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
28
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
29
Horticulture Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
30
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.9%