Back

Cultural affiliation accounts for most of the spatiotemporal variation in burial rite practices

Canteri, E.; Staniuk, R.; Timpson, A.; Schauer, P.; Bulatovic, J.; Ivanova-Bieg, M.; Reiter, S. S.; Rose, H. A.; Kolar, J.; Thomas, M. G.; Racimo, F.; Shennan, S.

2026-05-28 genetics
10.64898/2026.05.25.725982 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Describing and interpreting spatiotemporal patterns in human culture has been a central focus of anthropology and archaeology for over a century. Recent ethnographic studies have highlighted the complexity of the processes generating these patterns, including isolation-by-distance, homophily, and common descent. However, investigating these processes in prehistoric archaeology remains challenging. Here we make use of a new interdisciplinary database and a combined dataset of ancient DNA (aDNA) genomic sequences to analyse the relationship between spatiotemporal patterns in cultural and genomic variation, by testing whether broadly defined clusters of genomic affinities correspond to spatiotemporal changes in burial rites, while controlling for other factors, using a Gaussian process model. We use data from the Big Interdisciplinary Archaeological Database (BIAD), linking mortuary information from [~]4,200 individuals with genetic ancestry and mobility data inferred from over 1,300 human genomes, from Western Eurasia [~]10,000-2000 BP. By integrating and modelling these diverse datasets, we aim to provide a detailed understanding of how genomic history intersects with cultural evolution, offering new insights into the dynamics behind these complex processes, and the extent to which genes and culture are transmitted in parallel. In the case of burial orientation, we found that cultural affiliation was the main factor accounting for variation with little to no role for ancestry, while for body position the picture was more mixed but cultural affiliation also played an important role.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 3%
9.9%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 6%
9.9%
3
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.1%
4
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.7%
5
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.7%
6
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
7
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.8%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.9%
10
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
11
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
12
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
13
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
15
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
16
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
17
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
18
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
20
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
22
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
23
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
25
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
26
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.6%
27
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.6%