Why is team-based hypertension care failing to take hold in Australia? Real-world evidence from primary care
Satheesh, G.; Slater, K.; Trivedi, R.; Clapham, E.; Lopez, F. M.; McCormack, B.; Miranda, J. J.; Mishra, S. R.; Peterson, G. M.; Sarkies, M.; Schutte, A. E.; Chapman, N.
Show abstract
Objective: The shortage of general practitioners (GPs) in Australia has intensified interest in team-based care for hypertension, involving pharmacists and nurses. This study explored primary care provider experiences, barriers, and facilitators related to implementing team-based care in Australia. Design: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with primary care providers. Methods: We conducted 51 interviews with GPs (n=24), nurses (n=12), and pharmacists (n=15), purposively selected from diverse primary care settings. Analysis combined deductive coding, informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, with inductive thematic analysis to identify emergent themes. Results: Interviews demonstrated a predominantly GP-centred care model, with nurse and pharmacist involvement largely confined to supporting roles, including blood pressure measurement, prescription refills, patient follow-up and counselling. Their contributions were constrained by barriers at both practice (e.g., limited GP support, fragmented communication across providers) and health system levels (e.g., limited financial incentives and restricted reimbursement pathways). Despite their critical role in care planning, nurses described being hamstrung by workload and limited direct funding for hypertension-related services. Pharmacists reported unreimbursed blood pressure checks and restricted funding for medication reviews that constrained the sustainability of their hypertension services. Role ambiguity and the absence of standardised protocols on task sharing further limited collaboration, with nurses and pharmacists describing concerns about overstepping professional boundaries. Attitudes towards team-based care ranged from active disregard (outright rejection) to conditional acceptance and occasional active uptake (strong endorsement). Conclusion: Despite clear willingness among nurses and pharmacists to alleviate GP burden, team-based care is rarely implemented in routine practice. Addressing system-level barriers (funding models that incentivise team-based care and standardised treatment protocols that clarify shared workflows), alongside provider-level barriers (stronger awareness and training that normalises task sharing), is critical to support genuine team-based hypertension care in Australia.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation of predictive risk stratification to reduce emergency admissions to hospital: experiences of general practitioners and practice managers 94%
- OpenSAFELY NHS Service Restoration Observatory 1: describing trends and variation in primary care clinical activity for 23.3 million patients in England during the first wave of COVID-19 92%
- Factors influencing focused practice: A qualitative study of resident and early-career family physician practice choices 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of the General Practice Pharmacist (GPP) intervention to optimise prescribing in Irish primary care: a non-randomised pilot study 94%
- Primary care use of laboratory tests in Northern Ireland Western Health and Social Care Trust: a cross-sectional study 92%
- The impact of the first wave of COVID-19 on those with lifelong conditions: a case study of congenital heart disease 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Attrition and associated factors among patients on chronic antihypertensive therapy at Mulago hospital, Uganda: A mixed method study 95%
- A qualitative exploration of barriers to efficient and effective Structured Medication Reviews in Primary Care: Findings from the DynAIRx study 95%
- What constitutes 'poor' adherence to medical advice for chronic diseases? Insights from a qualitative study among hypertension and diabetes patients in urban informal settlements, Mumbai Metropolitan Region 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability of fixed-dose combination treatments for hypertension in Kenya: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability 96%
- Access to hypertension services and health-seeking experiences in rural Coastal Kenya: A qualitative study 93%
- A qualitative study on factors influencing health workers’ uptake of a pilot surgical antibiotic prophylaxis stewardship programme in selected Georgian hospitals 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.