Why is team-based hypertension care failing to take hold in Australia? Real-world evidence from primary care
Satheesh, G.; Slater, K.; Trivedi, R.; Clapham, E.; Lopez, F. M.; McCormack, B.; Miranda, J. J.; Mishra, S. R.; Peterson, G. M.; Sarkies, M.; Schutte, A. E.; Chapman, N.
Show abstract
Objective: The shortage of general practitioners (GPs) in Australia has intensified interest in team-based care for hypertension, involving pharmacists and nurses. This study explored primary care provider experiences, barriers, and facilitators related to implementing team-based care in Australia. Design: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with primary care providers. Methods: We conducted 51 interviews with GPs (n=24), nurses (n=12), and pharmacists (n=15), purposively selected from diverse primary care settings. Analysis combined deductive coding, informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, with inductive thematic analysis to identify emergent themes. Results: Interviews demonstrated a predominantly GP-centred care model, with nurse and pharmacist involvement largely confined to supporting roles, including blood pressure measurement, prescription refills, patient follow-up and counselling. Their contributions were constrained by barriers at both practice (e.g., limited GP support, fragmented communication across providers) and health system levels (e.g., limited financial incentives and restricted reimbursement pathways). Despite their critical role in care planning, nurses described being hamstrung by workload and limited direct funding for hypertension-related services. Pharmacists reported unreimbursed blood pressure checks and restricted funding for medication reviews that constrained the sustainability of their hypertension services. Role ambiguity and the absence of standardised protocols on task sharing further limited collaboration, with nurses and pharmacists describing concerns about overstepping professional boundaries. Attitudes towards team-based care ranged from active disregard (outright rejection) to conditional acceptance and occasional active uptake (strong endorsement). Conclusion: Despite clear willingness among nurses and pharmacists to alleviate GP burden, team-based care is rarely implemented in routine practice. Addressing system-level barriers (funding models that incentivise team-based care and standardised treatment protocols that clarify shared workflows), alongside provider-level barriers (stronger awareness and training that normalises task sharing), is critical to support genuine team-based hypertension care in Australia.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.