Back

Predictors of maternal mental health and coping during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-country cross-sectional study

Liu, C.; Liu, M.; Dib, S.; Ferrando, M.; Kagawa, M.; Ongprasert, K.; Rougeaux, E.; Shukri, N. H. M.; Vazquez, A.; Wells, J.; Fewtrell, M.; Yu, J.

2026-05-25 public and global health
10.64898/2026.05.25.26353920 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objectives and study: This study aimed to examine predictors of post-partum maternal mental health (MMH) and coping during COVID-19 lockdown across seven countries (the UK, China, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Argentina, and Thailand). Methods: An anonymous questionnaire, developed in the UK in English and translated into local languages, was used in 2021-2022 to collect data on MMH and perceived coping ability from women aged [&ge;]18 years with an infant born before or during lockdowns. Five MMH components (worry, sadness, loneliness, difficulty relaxing, annoyance) and coping were assessed on a 4-point Likert scale, then dichotomised. MMH and coping were compared across countries using Chi-square tests with post-hoc pairwise comparisons conducted via Bonferroni-adjusted z-tests. Predictors of MMH and coping were examined using multivariable logistic regression. Results: A total of 7,650 women were analysed. Younger infant age, higher income, walking and exercise, and level of support were associated with better MMH and coping, whereas higher education was associated with better coping but poorer MMH. MMH and coping differed across countries (all p<0.001), which remained after adjusting for covariates: mothers in Asian countries reported better MMH, while those in the UK and Thailand reported better coping. Conclusions: Postpartum MMH and coping during lockdown were shaped by both individual and contextual factors. Findings highlight cross-country differences and underscore the need to strengthen maternal support system during future disruptions to perinatal care. Keywords: Mental Health, COVID-19, Postpartum Period, Coping Behaviour, Social Support, Cross-Cultural Comparison

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 3%
28.8%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.8%
3
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.5%
4
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
7
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
8
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
9
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
10
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
11
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
12
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.3%
14
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
15
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
16
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
18
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
21
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
23
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
27
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
29
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%