Back

A scutum-focused deep learning pipeline for species-level identification of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus from citizen-science images

Kruthiventi, N.; Hannum, A.; Megahed, A.; Chellappan, S.; Carney, R.; Kuusisto, F.; Uelmen, J. A.

2026-05-27 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.05.24.727056 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMosquito-borne diseases transmitted by Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus -- including dengue, Zika, chikungunya, and yellow fever -- depend critically on rapid and accurate vector identification. Although deep learning has achieved high accuracy on curated laboratory images, performance degrades substantially when applied to community-submitted photographs that vary widely in quality, framing, and background. We sought to develop a robust pipeline for distinguishing these two morphologically similar vectors from real-world citizen-science images. MethodsWe compiled 2,112 mosquito images from the Global Mosquito Observation Database (GMOD) and assembled a multi-stage pipeline comprising: (i) a binary classifier to screen for mosquito presence; (ii) a YOLO-based object detector to localize specimens; (iii) an image-quality assessment module evaluating brightness, sharpness (Laplacian variance), contrast, and bounding-box ratio; (iv) Segment Anything Model (SAM) segmentation to isolate specimens from background clutter; and (v) a YOLO classifier trained on binary segmentation masks. To target the diagnostic characters used in conventional morphological taxonomy, we refined the pipeline to focus detection on the thoracic scutum -- the region bearing the lyre-shaped pale-scale pattern of Ae. aegypti and the median white stripe of Ae. albopictus. ResultsBaseline YOLO classification on raw images achieved 30.95% accuracy for Ae. aegypti and 78.4% for Ae. albopictus, reflecting strong class imbalance and background noise. Augmentation alone provided only modest gains. The presence/absence classifier reached 90.52% accuracy, and the object detector localized mosquitoes with near-perfect precision. Whole-body SAM-mask classification improved overall accuracy to 68.21%. Refining the pipeline to scutum-focused classification yielded preliminary accuracies of 87.5% and 83.3% for Ae. albopictus and Ae. aegypti, respectively. ConclusionsCommunity-sourced mosquito images, despite substantial noise and inconsistency, can support automated species-level vector surveillance when paired with a domain-informed, multi-stage deep-learning pipeline. Aligning machine attention with the morphological characters used by entomologists -- via scutum-focused detection -- delivers meaningful accuracy gains. This framework supports scalable citizen-science vector monitoring and lays the groundwork for integrating high-fidelity three-dimensional reference libraries to further strengthen real-world classifier performance.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.7%
2
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.9%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.8%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.8%
5
Insects
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.3%
7
Systematic Entomology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.5%
9
Parasites & Vectors
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
10
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
11
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
12
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
13
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
15
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
16
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
18
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
19
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
20
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.8%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.6%
24
Animals
23 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
25
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%