Back

A Pipeline for Solving Edge-Matching Puzzles and Their Implications for Protein Folding

Seifer, S.

2026-05-24 biophysics
10.64898/2026.05.23.727379 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Progress in quantum computation offers new opportunities for addressing longstanding combinatorial challenges. One such challenge is the Eternity II edge-matching puzzle, consisting of 256 tiles, which has resisted solution despite extensive community effort. The computational complexity of this NP-complete problem exceeds the capacity of current quantum annealing processors but lies within reach of hybrid quantum-classical solvers. Testing a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) model of a puzzle on a D-Wave hybrid solver demonstrates a complete solution only for puzzle instances up to 64 tiles. Simulated quantum annealing fails on this benchmark, whereas an original classical heuristic, "nucleation with deduction", succeeds. To approach the full Eternity II puzzle, I developed a MATLAB package that integrates multiple quantum and classical approaches, including neural-network transformers and gradient-based refinement. A multistage computation pipeline is demonstrated successfully on a puzzle comparable in complexity to Eternity II and with a known solution, based on multiple hybrid optimization steps with both "hard" and "soft" constraint formulations, identification of persistent substructures, and a final classical refinement stage. The resulting optimization problem involves [~]100,000 logical variables and requires partial initialization. Intriguingly, solving this puzzle mirrors the "end game" of protein folding, a process that nature completes in mere fractions of a second, seemingly defying expectations set by the Levinthal paradox. The prospect of predicting protein structure by quantum annealing is reviewed in light of these results.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.8%
2
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.2%
3
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.2%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.3%
6
Entropy
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Journal of Computational Chemistry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
167 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 18%
3.2%
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.2%
11
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
12
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
13
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.4%
14
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
88 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
15
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
16
The Journal of Chemical Physics
56 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
17
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
140 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
18
Physical Review Letters
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
19
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
20
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
21
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.3%
22
Biophysical Reports
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
23
Frontiers in Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
24
Biosystems
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
25
Physical Biology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
26
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.1%
27
Communications Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
28
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
29
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
30
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%