Back

Learning molecular determinants of selective small-molecule partitioning across biomolecular condensates

Khambhawala, A.; Rekhi, S.; Chen, Q.; Mohanty, P.; Tabor, D. P.; Mittal, J.

2026-05-27 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.05.23.727301 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The functional role of biomolecular condensates is shaped by the composition of constituent proteins, nucleic acids, ions, and small molecules. Selective partitioning of small molecules into condensates has therefore emerged as a potential route to condensate-specific chemical probes and therapeutics. Although partitioning is influenced by differences in solvation environments between coexisting dense and dilute phases, a molecular framework connecting small-molecule structure to condensate-specific enrichment remains lacking. Here, we use existing experimental partitioning data for a library of FDA-approved drugs and metabolites across four biomolecular condensates to develop an interpretable graph-based model of small-molecule partitioning. By combining multitask pretraining, condensate-specific fine-tuning, evidential uncertainty quantification, and atom-level attribution analysis, our model predicts continuous partition coefficients with improved accuracy over descriptor-based approaches. Atom-level attributions reveal that condensate partitioning is not governed by a universal chemical rule: the same molecular scaffold can be read differently by distinct condensate environments, with local atomic context and connectivity determining whether specific atoms promote or suppress enrichment. We further apply the trained model to ~1.7 million drug-like molecules from ChEMBL, identifying a chemically diverse space of predicted condensate-selective partitioners and mapping regions where predictions are confident versus where new measurements would be most informative. Together, this work establishes condensate partitioning as a chemically learnable property shaped by the interplay between small-molecule structure and condensate-specific microenvironments, providing an interpretable and uncertainty-aware framework for defining molecular determinants of partitioning and guiding the discovery of condensate-selective small molecules.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.8%
3
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
11.8%
4
Chemical Science
73 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
5
Journal of the American Chemical Society
217 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
6
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.5%
8
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
93 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.4%
9
ACS Central Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
10
Nature Chemical Biology
119 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.6%
11
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
13
Nature Chemistry
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
16
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.3%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.3%
18
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.1%
19
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
20
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.1%
21
JACS Au
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
22
Journal of Cheminformatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
23
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
24
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
26
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%