Machine Learning Estimation of Gestational Age at Delivery Using Linked Mother-Infant Electronic Health Records Across Two Health Systems
Bejan, C. A.; Yang, X.; Pham, A.; Qassem, L.; Abraham, A. A.; Choi, L.; Rosenbloom, S. T.; Gamire, L. X.; Phillips, E. J.
Show abstract
Objective This study aimed to train and evaluate supervised machine learning algorithms using electronic health record (EHR) data to accurately estimate gestational age at delivery. <br>Materials and Methods We trained random forest, gradient boosting, and ensemble models on EHR data of mother-infant dyads from Vanderbilt University Medical Center(VUMC) and replicated the analyses at University of Michigan (UMich). We further analyzed EHR predictors of gestational age, assessed temporal drift in EHR data elements, and evaluated model performance stratified by delivery status. <br>Results The study included pregnancies corresponding to 54,344 and 34,345 mother-infant dyads at VUMC (2005-2025) and UMich (2012-2024), respectively. The gestational age predictions of the ensemble models achieved the highest agreement with the reference standard on the VUMC dataset ({+/-}1 week: 85.2%, {+/-}2 weeks: 94.3%, MAE: 4.4 days) and demonstrated stronger generalization on the UMich dataset ({+/-}1 week: 93.1%, {+/-}2 weeks: 97.8%, MAE: 2.8 days). Further, performance was better among pregnancies delivered in more recent years, and among full- and late-term deliveries compared with preterm deliveries. <br>Discussion The results indicate that supervised machine learning methods leveraging linked mother-infant EHRs can accurately estimate gestational age at delivery, while demonstrating the generalizability of the modeling approach and the portability of the analytic workflow across healthcare sites. <br>Conclusion This study presents a robust and generalizable machine learning framework to estimate gestational age at delivery. The framework can be reliably used to impute gestational age in large-scale, real-world clinical studies to support maternal and neonatal health research, in which accurate estimation of pregnancy onset is critical.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Who is pregnant? defining real-world data-based pregnancy episodes in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) 96%
- Modeling physician variability to prioritize relevant medical record information 91%
- A deep learning model for clinical outcome prediction using longitudinal inpatient electronic health records 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving Pre-eclampsia Risk Prediction by Modeling Individualized Pregnancy Trajectories Derived from Routinely Collected Electronic Medical Record Data 96%
- Zero-shot Interpretable Phenotyping of Postpartum Hemorrhage Using Large Language Models 95%
- Continuous-Time and Dynamic Suicide Attempt Risk Prediction with Neural Ordinary Differential Equations 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting preterm births from electrohysterogram recordings via deep learning 94%
- Ranked severe maternal morbidity index for population-level surveillance at delivery hospitalization based on hospital discharge data 93%
- A compelling symmetry: The extended fetuses-at-risk perspective on modal, optimal and relative birthweight and gestational age 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Widely accessible prognostication using medical history for fetal growth restriction and small for gestational age in nationwide insured women 97%
- SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection in pregnant women: characterization of symptoms and syndromes predictive of disease and severity through real-time, remote participatory epidemiology 93%
- Evaluation of Domain Generalization and Adaptation on Improving Model Robustness to Temporal Dataset Shift in Clinical Medicine 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.