Back

Development and validation of a dynamic risk stratification tool for predicting multidrug-resistant bacterial infections in ICU patients: A clinical prediction model and web-based calculator

Ye, L.; Lyu, B.; Yang, Q.; Mou, X.; Nawawonganun, R.; Laohasiriwong, W.

2026-05-26 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.64898/2026.05.23.26353927 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Multi-drug resistant Bacterial (MDRB) Infections in the intensive care units (ICUs) substantially elevate patient mortality, prolong hospital stays, and impose heavy healthcare cost burdens. Existing predictive models for ICU-acquired MDRB infection predominantly focus on static admission-risk assessment, lacking the capacity to leverage longitudinal treatment data for dynamic risk re-stratification during the ICU stay. Meanwhile, most models suffer from poor clinical interpretability, overreliance on hard-to-collect biomarkers, or absence of deployable clinical tools, limiting real-world translation. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop a parsimonious, interpretable tool based on routine cumulative data to guide timely intervention. This study aimed to develop a interpretable model with a web calculator to improve clinical applicability. Methods: In this study, we conducted a retrospective analysis of ICU inpatients at the First Affiliated Hospital of Dali University between January 1, 2023, and January 1, 2026. Using the create Data Partition function in R software (random seed = 42), the dataset was stratified and divided into a training group and a validation group in a 7:3 ratio. Feature selection was performed using the Boruta algorithm to validate variable rationality. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed and visualized as a nomogram, and its performance was compared with six machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, XG Boost, Neural Network, etc.). Model validation was conducted using receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC), Decision Curve Analysis (DCA), and SHAP value interpretation. Finally, an online R Shiny calculator was developed based on the final model. Results: A total of 3,631 patients were enrolled and divided into a training group (n=2,543) and a validation group (n=1,088) using stratified random sampling. Five independent predictors were identified in the training group, which were hypertension combined with diabetes, antibiotic types, ventilator days, urinary catheter days, and PCT abnormality times. The Logistic regression model achieved an AUC of 0.772 (95%CI: 0.733-0.812) in the validation group, outperforming XG Boost (0.763) and Random Forest (0.703). The model demonstrated excellent calibration (Hosmer-Leme show {chi}{superscript 2} = 1.94, P = 0.9829) and positive net clinical benefit across threshold probabilities of 0%-40%. SHAP analysis aligned with regression-derived variable importance rankings, confirming predictor contributions. An open-access online calculator was successfully deployed (https://dongfangshao666.shinyapps.io/MDR_shiny2/), enabling real-time individualized risk stratification at the bedside. Conclusion: This study developed and validated a dynamic, interpretable multi-drug-resistant bacterial infection risk prediction model requiring only five routinely collected clinical indicators. The model balances robust predictive performance with high transparency, overcoming key limitations of prior tools. The accompanying web calculator supports dynamic risk reassessment throughout the ICU stay, facilitating precise antimicrobial stewardship, targeted infection control interventions, and optimized resource allocation, bridging the gap between statistical modeling and frontline clinical decision-making.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 9%
19.0%
2
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
3
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.1%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
8.1%
5
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
109 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
8
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
9
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
10
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
11
International Journal of Medical Informatics
26 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.5%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
14
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
16
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
17
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
18
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Critical Care Explorations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
21
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
22
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Annals of Translational Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
24
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%