Back

Nutritional status, clinical burden, and healthcare utilization among pediatric outpatients with congenital heart disease: A retrospective cross-sectional study from Indonesia

Amelia, P.; Sahertian, L. C. D.; Adriansyah, R.; Kannady, J.

2026-05-26 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.05.23.26353925 medRxiv
Show abstract

Congenital heart disease contributes substantially to chronic morbidity, growth impairment, and repeated healthcare utilization among children. Evidence regarding nutritional burden and outpatient healthcare patterns among pediatric patients with congenital heart disease in Indonesia remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate clinical characteristics, nutritional status, healthcare utilization, and factors associated with malnutrition among pediatric outpatients with congenital heart disease at Adam Malik General Hospital, Indonesia. A retrospective observational study was conducted using medical records of pediatric outpatients treated between January and December 2024. Demographic characteristics, cardiac diagnoses, nutritional status, complications, and outpatient visit history were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with malnutrition. A total of 606 pediatric outpatients were included. Non cyanotic congenital heart disease predominated the cohort, with ventricular septal defect representing the most common diagnosis followed by patent ductus arteriosus and atrial septal defect. Nearly half of all patients demonstrated underweight or severe underweight nutritional status, while pulmonary hypertension emerged as the most frequent complication. Younger pediatric age groups and higher cumulative clinical burden independently increased the odds of malnutrition. Children with congenital heart disease at this tertiary referral center carried a substantial nutritional and clinical burden. Early nutritional surveillance and integrated long term outpatient management may improve growth outcomes and reduce chronic disease burden in resource limited settings.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.0%
2
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
3
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.6%
4
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.9%
5
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
6
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.7%
8
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.3%
10
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
11
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
12
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
14
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
17
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
19
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
23
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
26
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
27
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
28
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%