Back

Toward Large-Scale Numerical Modeling of the Cardiovascular System with up to 34 Billion Vessels

Newhauser, W.; Cole, M.; Diehl, P.; Moreno, J.; Kaiser, H.; Tohid, R.; Nader, N.; Chancellor, J.

2026-05-27 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.05.22.727287 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cardiovascular diseases, such as stroke and heart attacks, are the leading cause of death worldwide. Computational models like cardiovascular digital twins (CVDTs) offer a promising path for research and intervention but are challenged by the complexity of simulating the full human vasculature. This study evaluates the feasibility of simulating blood flow through a vascular network containing 34 billion vessels (the estimated number in the human body) using first-principles physics and simplified geometry which is a first step towards CVDT. We synthesized 3D vasculature using a fractal model and computed blood flow rates via Poiseuille equation and steady-state fluid dynamics, implemented with high-performance computing. Simulations were conducted for networks ranging from 6 vessels to 34 billion vessels. The results demonstrated high accuracy (within 1% of bench-marks), reproducibility across platforms, and strong scalability. Simulating the full vasculature required 156 node-hours on the second-fastest supercomputer in the world, using 29 TB of memory and 84 TFLOPS. Maximum speedup factor was 80, with parallel efficiency no lower than 0.48. These findings show it is computationally feasible to simulate blood flow through a full-body vascular network at scale. The approach is well suited to parallel computing, suggesting that with continued development, CVDTs could enable whole-organism modeling for applications such as stroke, trauma, radiation injury, and cancer metastasis.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.3%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.4%
4
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.3%
5
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.9%
6
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
7
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
8
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
9
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
11
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
16
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
17
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
21
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
22
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
23
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
24
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
25
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
26
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
27
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
29
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%