Back

Longitudinal Awake Mouse Brain Imaging Using Functional Ultrasound and Functional Ultrasound Localization Microscopy

Huang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Lowerison, M. R.; Xu, Y.; Lin, B.-Z.; Shin, Y.; Vaithiyalingam Chandra Sekaran, N.; Llano, D. A.; Song, P.

2026-05-26 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.22.727269 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Ultrafast ultrasound offers a unique route to cross-scale neurovascular phenotyping by integrating functional ultrasound (fUS), ultrasound localization microscopy (ULM), and functional ULM (fULM). Yet the baseline variability, longitudinal stability, and biological safety of such multimodal imaging in awake animals remain insufficiently defined, limiting its use for detecting subtle disease-associated neurovascular changes. Here, an awake longitudinal fUS-ULM-fULM framework is established and validated in mice over five months. Structural vascularity, microvascular flow velocity, mesoscale hemodynamic responses, and microvascular functional responses are repeatedly quantified in the same animals during monthly imaging sessions. Across all metrics, no significant longitudinal drift is detected (p > 0.60). Structural and flow-derived measures are markedly more reproducible than functional readouts, with within-subject coefficients of variation of 5.1% for mean flow velocity and 7.3% for vascularity, compared with 25.0% for fUS-derived cerebral blood volume responses and 53.2% for fULM-derived microvascular functional responses. Mean flow velocity shows the strongest longitudinal consistency (ICC = 0.70) and the lowest detection threshold. Behavioral testing and GFAP/Iba1 staining further reveal no memory impairment or chronic neuroinflammation. This study defines quantitative baselines, reproducibility limits, and safety evidence for awake cross-scale ultrasound imaging, providing a reference framework for longitudinal neurovascular phenotyping in preclinical disease models.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.1%
2
Neurophotonics
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.8%
3
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.8%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.0%
5
Theranostics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
6
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 23%
2.1%
9
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 16%
2.1%
10
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.9%
12
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.5%
14
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
16
Journal of Controlled Release
44 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
17
Nature Biomedical Engineering
47 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
18
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
20
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.1%
21
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
24
Photoacoustics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
26
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
27
Light: Science & Applications
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
28
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%