Back

Random Fitness Landscapes are Highly Navigable

Oros, D.; Krug, J.

2026-05-26 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.05.22.727193 bioRxiv
Show abstract

With the increasing availability of large scale empirical fitness landscape data, there is a need for simple yet informative null models that can be used to interpret metrics of landscape ruggedness and navigability. A natural choice of a null model that maximizes ruggedness in a statistical sense assigns independent and identically distributed fitness values to the genotypes, a setting often referred to as the House-of-Cards (HoC) or mutational landscape model. In this work we examine the navigability of these landscapes, as quantified by the mean size of the adaptive basins of local fitness peaks. The adaptive basin is the set of genotypes from which a peak can be reached via selectively accessible, i.e., strictly fitnessincreasing mutational paths. Building on recent rigorous results on the statistics of accessible paths, we show that the adaptive basins in the HoC landscape encompass a positive fraction of all genotypes that is an analytically computable, increasing function of the number of alleles per site. For the four letter nucleotide alphabet, an average peak basin contains 52.8 % of all genotypes. When conditioned on peak fitness, the expected basin size increases linearly with fitness rank. The exact results on adaptive basins are complemented by an approximate analysis of gradient basins formed by greedy adaptive paths which maximize the fitness increase in each step. We argue that recent reports of large adaptive basins in empirical fitness landscapes should be reinterpreted in the light of our findings.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
26.2%
2
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.3%
3
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.9%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 14%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
7
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.5%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
12
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
13
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
15
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
16
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
18
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
Theoretical Population Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.7%
24
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%