Back

LVentiView: An Open-Source Software for Automated 3D Left Ventricular Mesh Reconstruction and Analysis from Cardiac MRI

Braun, I.; Wang, Y.; Ecker, A. S.; Bodenschatz, E.

2026-05-26 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.05.22.727166 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Patient-specific cardiac modeling requires accurate three-dimensional representations of the left ventricle (LV) reconstructed from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Here, we present LVentiView, an open-source software that bridges medical imaging and cardiac simulation by automating the full pipeline from MRI segmentation to simulation-ready volumetric meshes, with integrated tools for volumetric analysis and regional myocardial thickness calculation. We validate LVentiView on the Sunnybrook Cardiac Dataset, comprising healthy subjects and three cardiac pathologies. LVentiView achieves blood pool segmentation at the inter-expert level. The generated meshes are verified by comparing LV volumes extracted from the meshes to those computed from expert manual segmentation masks, with volumes and cardiac parameters agreeing within inter-expert variability across all four cardiac pathologies. In addition, mesh-derived regional thickness maps capture pathology-specific patterns, including wall thickening in hypertrophic cases. LVentiView is freely available on GitHub and provides an accessible, validated foundation for patient-specific cardiac modeling. HighlightsO_LILVentiView automates the full pipeline from MRI segmentation to simulation-ready meshes. C_LIO_LIMesh-derived cardiac volumes and parameters match expert manual segmentation accuracy. C_LIO_LIThickness maps capture pathology-specific patterns, validating geometrical fidelity. C_LIO_LISegmentation runs at {approx} 0.07 s per slice; meshing under 3 min per frame. C_LI Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=72 SRC="FIGDIR/small/727166v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (22K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f10d08org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@18eab94org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a298e9org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e52347_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.9%
3
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.4%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.9%
5
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
7
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.3%
8
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
9
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
11
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
12
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
13
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
15
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
Aperture Neuro
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
SoftwareX
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
21
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
22
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.0%
23
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
24
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
29
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%