Back

No need for fat: Nutritional preferences affect pollen foraging networks in alpine pollinator communities

Schleifer, M. C.; Neumayer, J.; Ruedenauer, F. A.; Castiglioni, L.; Keller, A.; Spaethe, J.; Leonhardt, S. D.

2026-05-26 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.05.22.727106 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Most flowering plant species rely on insect pollinators for successful cross-pollination. While floral color, scent, and morphology help attract visitors, the primary motivation for visiting a flower is the nutritional reward - nectar and, especially, pollen. Pollen provides a complete set of macro- and micronutrients essential for adult and larval provisioning in many insect flower visitors. However, pollen nutrient composition (i.e., quality) varies widely among plant species, and different visitors may have distinct nutritional requirements. Whether these differences are linked to the selection of plants visited remains poorly understood. In this study, we investigated whether the nutrient composition of pollen is linked to the visitation patterns of two main alpine pollinator groups: bumblebees and hoverflies. We observed flower visits in the field and identified the origin of pollen collected by bumblebees and hoverflies via metabarcoding. In addition, we analyzed the nutrient profiles of alpine flowering plants from the same habitat, including amino acids, fatty acids, and sterols. We hypothesized that both bumblebees and hoverflies (i) differ in the plant spectrum they were observed on/collected from and visited for pollen collection, (ii) and that preferred nutrient profiles differ between the two pollinator groups. We additionally expected (iii) that, in the studied alpine plant communities, the nutrient composition of pollen of plant species collected by flower visitors is more strongly associated with pollinator identity than with plant phylogeny due to competition for pollinators. Our results revealed that alpine bumblebees and hoverflies were more similar in their pollen hosts and nutritional preferences than expected, but, for both groups, the network based on observed flower visits differed significantly from that based on pollen collection. Pollen fatty acids and amino acids content was positively correlated, and both bumblebees and hoverflies preferred pollen with low fatty and amino acid content. Pollen sterols did not differ between plants collected by pollinators and non-collected plants. Neither fatty acid, amino acid, nor sterol composition was linked to plant phylogeny. Our findings suggest that not only amino acid content, but also fatty acid content, plays a key role in shaping pollen-collection patterns of flower visitors in alpine ecosystems.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 17%
11.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 7%
8.0%
4
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
5
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
6
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
7
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
8
Journal of Comparative Physiology A
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
9
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
50% of probability mass above
10
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.8%
12
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
13
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
Ethology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Animal Cognition
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
19
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
21
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
22
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
23
Biology Letters
76 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
24
Behavioural Processes
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
25
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
26
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
27
Insects
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
28
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
29
Behavioral Ecology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
30
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%