Back

A demographic framework for assessing population vulnerability to contrasting perturbation regimes

Gimenez-Romero, A.; Oro, D.; Doak, D. F.; Garcia, M. B.; Genovart, M.

2026-05-26 ecology
10.64898/2026.05.22.727074 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Environmental change affects demographic rates through perturbations that differ in magnitude, duration, and frequency, yet their consequences for population vulnerability, i.e., potential population reduction, remain only partly understood. Here, we develop a general demographic framework that unifies pulse and press perturbations to better understand how life-history strategy shapes population declines across the fast-slow continuum. Using matrix population models for 12 plant and animal species with diverse generation time and life history strategies, we simulated perturbations acting independently on adult survival, juvenile survival, and fecundity, and measured their demographic consequences over comparable life-history timescales. We then integrated impacts across perturbation regimes to derive a novel comparative vulnerability metric and related this metric to species life-history descriptors. Across taxa, perturbations to adult survival consistently produced the strongest demographic impacts, with vulnerability increasing markedly towards slower life histories. Juvenile survival emerged as the main axis of demographic differentiation among species, whereas the effects of perturbations on fecundity were weaker and comparatively homogeneous across the continuum. Generation time strongly predicted vulnerability to survival perturbations, but not to reproductive output. Consistent with previous theoretical and empirical work, our results show that vulnerability is not a fixed species property, but an emergent outcome of the interaction between the perturbed vital rate, the temporal structure of environmental forcing, and the underlying life-history strategy. Importantly, as the vulnerability metric can be compared both across populations under a given perturbation regime and within populations across perturbation types and demographic targets, the framework also provides a basis for stage-specific and regime-specific management.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
31.9%
2
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
3
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.6%
4
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.9%
6
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.1%
8
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 19%
3.0%
10
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
11
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
12
Ecological Monographs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.0%
14
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
15
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
17
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
18
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
20
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
21
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
22
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Theoretical Ecology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%