Back

Facial Skin Blood Flow Enhances the Human Likeness of Artificial Agents

Nikaido, S.; Isomura, T.

2026-05-26 physiology
10.64898/2026.05.22.726810 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recent studies have shown that implementing explicit social cues, such as gaze, facial expressions, and gestures, in artificial agents can improve impressions of these agents. However, humans may also use implicit physiological cues, such as facial coloration and cardiac information, in social perception. The present study examined whether subtle skin color changes reflecting pulse signals enhance the perceived human likeness of artificial agents, and whether this effect depends on agent type, signal type, observers interoceptive sensibility, and their awareness of the skin color changes. Participants observed morphed face stimuli created from artificial agents and human faces and judged whether each stimulus appeared human-like or robot-like. In Experiment 1, skin color changes based on human-derived pulse wave signals enhanced perceived human likeness for a highly human-like agent, but not for a less human-like agent. In Experiment 2, perceived human likeness was enhanced not only by pulse-based skin color changes but also by sinusoidal skin color changes matched to the pulse wave signal in terms of mean amplitude and number of peaks. In addition, participants with higher scores on some subscales of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA), a subjective measure of interoceptive sensibility, tended to notice the skin color changes. However, neither observers interoceptive sensibility nor their awareness of skin color changes directly explained the enhancement of perceived human likeness induced by skin color changes. These results suggest that subtle skin color changes reflecting pulse wave information may function as implicit dynamic cues signaling embodiment or biologicalness in artificial agents, thereby contributing to perceived human likeness.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 2%
36.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.9%
50% of probability mass above
3
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
4
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
5
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.6%
6
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.6%
8
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
9
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
10
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
11
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
12
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
13
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
14
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
15
Consciousness and Cognition
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
16
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
18
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
19
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
20
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.5%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.5%
24
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%