Back

Antimicrobial use contributes to resistance gene enrichment across cattle groups on commercial dairy farms

Steinberger, A. J.; Nickodem, C. A.; Leite de Campos, J.; Kates, A. E.; Goldberg, T. L.; Safdar, N.; Sethi, A. K.; Shutske, J. M.; Ruegg, P. L.; Suen, G.; Hite, J. L.

2026-05-26 genomics
10.64898/2026.05.22.726633 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Antimicrobial use (AMU) in agricultural systems is frequently linked to antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Yet, the scale at which AMU reshapes host-associated resistomes remains unclear. This gap arises, in part, from the scarcity of farm-level AMU data from commercial production systems. Here, we combine detailed AMU records from commercial dairy farms with metagenomic analyses of bovine fecal resistomes from calves, lactating cows, sick cows, and cull cows. At a broad level, resistome profiles were similar regardless of farm AMU. Resistance associated with historically common antibiotics, such as tetracyclines, was frequent on low- and high-AMU farms, indicating that some resistance classes are ubiquitous in dairy systems regardless of current AMU. In contrast, resistance to other drug classes varied systematically with AMU. Higher AMU was associated with increased resistance to aminoglycosides, {beta}-lactams, and macrolides, drug classes that are critical for treating mastitis and bovine respiratory disease. Resistance gene richness and diversity were highest in calves, underscoring the importance of accounting for host traits alongside AMU when evaluating resistance patterns. Together, these findings underscore the need for detailed, farm-level AMU data to understand how management practices shape AMR and to inform strategies for sustaining the effectiveness of existing antimicrobials in agricultural and public-health contexts.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 32%
5.0%
3
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.0%
4
Journal of Dairy Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
6
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.7%
8
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.2%
10
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
11
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
12
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.9%
15
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
16
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
18
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
19
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
20
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.0%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
24
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
27
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Animal Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
30
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%