Back

Normative modeling for quantitative brain MRI phenotyping and biomarker discovery for pediatric leukodystrophies

Karandikar, S.; Sevagamoorthy, A.; Zimmerman, D.; D'Aiello, R.; Dorfschmidt, L.; Cyr, K.; Jung, B.; Levitis, E.; Adang, L. A.; Arnold, K.; Bennett, M. L.; Charsar, B. A.; Dominguez Gonzalez, C. A.; Gavazzi, F.; Hong, P.; Orthmann-Murphy, J. L.; Pham, S. T.; Kelley, K.; Lerner, M.; Shults, J.; Thakur, N.; Vossough, A.; Waldman, A. T.; White, A.; Whitehead, M. T.; Emrick, L.; Fraser, J.; Van Haren, K.; Keller, S.; Fatemi, A.; Eichler, F.; Bonkowsky, J. L.; The Global Leukodystrophy Initiative Clinical Trials Network Workgroup, ; Seidlitz, J.; Alexander-Bloch, A. F.; Vanderver, A.

2026-05-25 neurology
10.64898/2026.05.22.26353512 medRxiv
Show abstract

Importance: Leukodystrophies are a heterogeneous group of genetic disorders affecting the white matter of the brain, often presenting with overlapping clinical features but differing in neuroanatomical involvement. There is a critical need for quantitative tools to characterize disease burden and support diagnosis, severity stratification, and clinical trial readiness. Objective: To characterize shared and distinct neuroanatomical patterns across six genetically confirmed leukodystrophies using anatomical MRI-derived phenotypes benchmarked against brain growth charts, and to assess the utility of this methodological approach for identifying imaging biomarkers of disease severity. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cross-sectional neuroimaging study using retrospective clinical MRI data. Setting: Multicenter study incorporating data from the Global Leukodystrophy Initiative Clinical Trials Network (GLIA-CTN) and control data from the Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia. Participants: The study included 434 MRI scan sessions from 274 patients with genetically confirmed leukodystrophies (Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease, Metachromatic leukodystrophy, Alexander disease, Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome, TUBB4A-related leukodystrophies, and POLR3-related leukodystrophy). Control MRI data (7628 scans from 7205 subjects) were drawn from the Scans with Limited Imaging Pathology cohort at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Exposures: All MRI scans underwent automated segmentation using deep learning segmentation tools to derive global and regional brain volumes. Normative models of brain development ("brain growth charts") were generated for the control cohort using generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape. Centile scores were then calculated for leukodystrophy subjects to quantify deviations from typical development. Main Outcomes and Measures: Centile scores for global and regional brain volumes were compared across leukodystrophy subtypes to identify disease-specific neuroanatomical patterns and to evaluate their potential utility for severity stratification. Results: Distinct patterns of neuroanatomical deviation were observed across leukodystrophy subtypes. Certain leukodystrophies showed preferential involvement of specific cortical or subcortical regions, while others displayed more diffuse volume loss. Centile scores demonstrated potential for differentiating disease subtypes and stratifying individuals by severity. Preliminary longitudinal data suggest centile scores may also track progression over time. Conclusions and Relevance:This study demonstrates the feasibility and utility of MRI profiling of individuals with leukodystrophy using anatomical MRI-derived phenotypes benchmarked against brain growth charts. The approach enables data-driven, quantitative characterization of structural brain abnormalities, offering a scalable method for phenotyping, diagnosis, and future use in clinical trials.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
3
Epilepsia
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
4
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
5
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
6
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.2%
7
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
9
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.5%
11
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.9%
14
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.5%
17
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
18
Neurology Genetics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
19
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
22
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
26
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
27
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
29
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
30
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%