Back

An examination of the effect of dual task on gait variability in Parkinson's disease and REM Sleep Behavior disorder

Gallagher, C. L.; Haebig, M. B.; Heroor, A.; Tiwari, R.; Plante, D. T.; Okonkwo, O.; Baker, J.; Buyan-Dent, L.; Mangin, T.; Shannon, K.; Pickett, K. A.; Wisconsin Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Madison, Wisconsin.,

2026-05-25 neurology
10.64898/2026.05.22.26353152 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Gait variability is a hallmark of Parkinson's disease (PD) and has been linked to cognitive deficits and fall risk. Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is a strong predictor of synucleinopathies, yet evidence for gait changes in RBD is inconsistent. Performing a dual task increases gait variability, an effect that can be quantified using a cost function. Objective: Determine the degree to which dual task cost differs between control, RBD, and PD participants at baseline, and between RBD converters versus non-converters at follow-up. Methods: 46 RBD, 23 control, and 14 PD participants completed standardized gait analysis at baseline. Parameters chosen for analysis included enhanced gait variability index (eGVI), functional ambulation performance (FAP), velocity, step length, cadence, base of support, and double support time. Medical records were surveilled for 3 years following participant enrollment, determining that 6 RBD participants converted to PD or dementia. Baseline gait indices and dual task costs were compared between control, RBD, and PD groups at enrollment, and between RBD stable and RBD converters at follow-up. Results: The PD group had greater eGVI, as well as greater dual task cost for FAP, cadence, width, and double support time. No differences in gait variability were identified between RBD and control groups at baseline. Compared to the stable group, RBD converters had greater dual task cost for FAP, velocity, cadence, and double support time. Conclusions: Increased gait variability during dual task may identify RBD patients at imminent risk of phenoconversion.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Movement Disorders
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
Journal of Parkinson's Disease
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
3
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.6%
4
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
5
npj Parkinson's Disease
89 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
7
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.7%
8
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
10
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Sleep
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
14
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
16
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.2%
18
SLEEP
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
19
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
21
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
24
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%