Back

Determinants of specificity and end-user acceptability of an IP-10-based point-of-care triage test for antiretroviral therapy monitoring in Mozambique

Saura-Lazaro, A.; Adolfo Bila, D.; Van den Bogaart, E.; Myburgh, H.; Fisher-Cunhete, M.; Vaz, P.; Paulussen, R.; Viljoen, L.; Rinke de Wit, T. F.; Naniche, D.

2026-05-24 hiv aids
10.64898/2026.05.22.26353111 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction: Viral load (VL) monitoring is the gold standard for antiretroviral therapy (ART) monitoring. Still, due to limited funds and infrastructure, many people living with HIV (PLHIV) in low- and middle-income countries do not receive timely VL testing. We evaluated the clinical performance and end-user acceptability of a prototype interferon gamma-induced protein 10 (IP-10) point-of-care (POC) test as a rule-out triage tool to identify individuals unlikely to have unsuppressed VL in PLHIV in Mozambique. Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted between November 2023 and November 2024 at two primary healthcare facilities in Maputo Province. We enrolled 1,057 PLHIV on ART from stable and specialized risk clinics. Clinical performance of the IP-10 POC test (index test) was compared against plasma HIV VL (reference test; unsuppressed defined as >1000 copies/mL). Socio-demographic and clinical predictors of false-positive results were identified using multivariable logistic regression. Immediate acceptability was assessed through exit interviews on a subset of 43 PLHIV. Results: Among participants (71.7% female; median age 41.4 years), 12.0% had unsuppressed VL. The IP-10 POC test demonstrated high sensitivity (90.6%) and moderate specificity (35.6%). Specificity was higher in clinics treating stable patients (44.5% 95%CI: 39.7-49.3) compared to specialized risk clinics (26.5% 95%CI: 21.1-28.9). The proportion of false-positive results was also higher in patients attending specialized risk clinics. Independent predictors of false positivity included enrolment in a one-stop TB/HIV clinic (aOR=2.99 95%CI: 1.09-8.15), cotrimoxazole use (aOR=2.16, 95% CI: 1.13-4.13), and obesity (aOR=3.47 95%CI: 1.74-6.93). Acceptability was high: 70% of participants appreciated the test simplicity and rapid results, and 95.3% expressed interest in future testing. Most patients preferred finger-prick collection over venous draws. Conclusions: The IP-10 POC test is a highly sensitive triage tool, demonstrating superior performance among stable PLHIV enrolled in differentiated service delivery models like six-month multi-month dispensing. While factors associated with co-infections can reduce specificity, the test's high acceptability and potential to reduce confirmatory VL test demand suggests it could serve as a viable triage strategy for optimizing resources particularly in stable care pathways with a lower prevalence of inflammatory comorbidities. This could enable health systems to reallocate intensive monitoring toward higher-risk populations.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.4%
2
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
3
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.3%
5
Journal of the International AIDS Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
7
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.1%
8
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
10
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
11
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
12
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.3%
14
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
Sexually Transmitted Infections
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
18
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
19
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
20
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
21
AIDS and Behavior
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
22
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
23
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
24
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
AIDS
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
26
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
28
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
30
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%