Back

Individual Bird Identification by Modeling Temporal Structure in Bioacoustic Embeddings

Gallego, J.; Martinez-Vargas, J. D.; Lopez, J. D.

2026-05-26 ecology
10.64898/2026.05.21.727031 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIIdentifying individual animals from vocalizations is an emerging research area in computational bioacoustics. This non-invasive approach reduces reliance on physical capture and tagging for wildlife monitoring. Recent advances in this area leverage deep learning and bioacoustic foundation models adapted from species-level classifiers. However, these models typically rely on fixed-window inputs and may not fully capture temporal structure across extended or complex songs, which can contain information relevant to individual discrimination. C_LIO_LIHere, we evaluate whether modeling sequences of pretrained bioacoustic embeddings improves acoustic individual identification. We developed a framework that integrates transfer-learned spectrotemporal representations from BirdNET with a lightweight long short-term memory network. Unlike static baselines that use either the first embedding or an average over all embeddings, our approach processes time-ordered embedding sequences, allowing the classifier to use information distributed across multiple windows. C_LIO_LIWe evaluated the system using 87,865 vocalizations from 352 individuals across seven species. We used four publicly available vocalization datasets with individual-level labels, covering durations from 0.76 s (short calls) to 27.6 s (prolonged songs). Across five random seeds with stratified partitions, the framework achieved mean test accuracies between 93.9% and 98.3% and macro-F1 scores ranging from 93.2% to 98.3%, without data augmentation. The clearest gains over the strongest static baseline were observed for the great tit and the great spotted kiwi, reaching +1.3 and +2.8 percentage points, respectively. C_LIO_LIOur results indicate that the contribution of temporal sequence modeling depends on vocalization structure, rather than providing uniform evidence that chronological order drives performance. The benefit of recurrent aggregation was limited or absent for short calls but evident for long vocalizations with multiple informative windows. By combining bioacoustic foundation models with lightweight recurrent modeling, this approach provides a scalable, CPU-efficient tool for autonomous wildlife monitoring, particularly for species with extended or structurally complex vocalizations. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.8%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.7%
3
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
4
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.1%
7
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.7%
9
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.7%
12
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.7%
13
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
14
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
15
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
18
Remote Sensing
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
19
Movement Ecology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
20
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
22
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Ecological Indicators
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%