Back

Enhanced Workflow for Urinary Extracellular Vesicle Isolation Using Membrane-Sensing Peptides

Frigerio, R.; Tanzi, A.; Musico, A.; Grange, C.; Gagni, P.; Dolo, V.; GIusti, I.; Arosio, P.; Gori, A.; Bussolati, B.

2026-05-26 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.05.21.726982 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Urinary extracellular vesicles (uEVs) represent a promising source of non-invasive biomarkers; however, their clinical translation is still limited by suboptimal isolation strategies, which often suffer from poor scalability, co-isolation of abundant urinary proteins, and bias toward specific EV subpopulations. Here, we employ a membrane-sensing peptide (MSP)-based affinity approach for uEVs isolation, that exploits the highly lipid membranes curvature of EV as universal target, enabling pan-specific capture independent of surface marker expression. MSP-functionalized beads were applied to minimally processed urine samples and benchmarked against differential ultracentrifugation (dUC) and size-exclusion chromatography (SEC). Comprehensive characterization by nanoparticle tracking analysis, transmission electron microscopy, high-sensitivity flow cytometry, single-molecule array (SiMoA), and fluorescence nanoparticle tracking analysis, demonstrated that MSP-based isolation preserves vesicle integrity and maintains the native distribution of canonical tetraspanins (CD9, CD63, CD81), without evidence of subpopulation bias. Notably, MSP-based isolation significantly reduced co-isolated contaminants, such as uromodulin, resulting in improved sample purity. By combining high recovery, improved purity, and operational simplicity, MSP workflow offers practical advantages, including reduced processing time, scalability, and compatibility with standard laboratory equipment, without the need for extensive pre-processing. These properties characterize MSP-based affinity capture as a robust and versatile alternative to conventional uEVs isolation approaches, with strong potential for translational and clinical applications.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.0%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 23%
6.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.8%
4
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
5
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
6
Talanta
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
7
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.8%
9
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
10
Journal of Extracellular Biology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
11
Small Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
12
PROTEOMICS
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
13
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
14
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
15
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
16
Journal of Proteome Research
234 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.7%
18
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
The Analyst
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
20
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
22
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.0%
23
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
24
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
26
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
27
JACS Au
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
28
Biology
45 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
29
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
30
Journal of Neurochemistry
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%