Back

Convergent gene erosion in the chemical defensome of marine mammals

Danneels, B.; Oliveira, D. O.; Castro, F. L. C.; Karlsen, O. A.; Ruivo, R.; Goksoyr, A.

2026-05-23 genomics
10.64898/2026.05.21.726804 bioRxiv
Show abstract

To preserve homeostasis in the face of continual chemical insult, animals evolved dedicated molecular systems that detect, detoxify, and eliminate foreign compounds. Collectively, these enzymes, transporters, and regulatory pathways constitute the chemical defensome. In cetaceans, the loss of two key nuclear receptors (NR1I2/PXR and NR1I3/CAR) suggests a profound rearrangement of the chemical defense systems. Therefore, we investigated the gene inventory of the chemical defensome in Cetacea and two other major marine mammal lineages (Pinnipedia and Sirenia), using their closest terrestrial relatives to understand the extent and patterns of chemical defensome remodelling. We demonstrate large-scale gene loss in chemical defensome genes of cetaceans, as well as smaller scale gene loss in the other two marine mammal lineages, indicating possible convergent evolution. Gene loss occurred predominantly in phase I and phase II biotransformation enzymes, including CYPs, FMOs, SULTs, and GSTs. Many of the lost genes in cetaceans are known to be regulated by PXR and/or CAR, while genes lost in multiple marine mammal lineages are often not regulated by these transcription factors. We hypothesize that the transition to aquatic environments, often accompanied by corresponding changes in feeding habits, led to convergent loss of chemical defensome genes, and loss of PXR and CAR in cetaceans accelerated these losses. These findings reveal systematic erosion of chemical defense capabilities across marine mammal lineages, suggesting that adaptation to marine life involves trade-offs in detoxification capacity that may have significant implications for these species responses to increasing chemical pollution in present-day ocean environments.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.9%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 3%
14.0%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 3%
14.0%
4
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.7%
6
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.7%
7
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.2%
8
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 18%
3.0%
9
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
10
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.0%
11
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
12
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.8%
13
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.6%
14
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
15
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
16
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
17
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
19
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.7%
20
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.7%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 38%
0.6%
23
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%