Back

Bioimpedance spectroscopy assessment of skeletal muscle tissue properties after muscle damage

Bouvier, J.; de Freitas, S.; Letourneur, A.; Gouraud, E.; Foure, A.

2026-05-26 physiology
10.64898/2026.05.21.726237 bioRxiv
Show abstract

High intensity and unaccustomed physical activity can induce skeletal muscle damage, while even routine movements can cause similar alterations in patients with neuromuscular disease. However, reliable assessment of muscle damage using indirect markers such as muscle function evaluation, invasive measurements, or imaging techniques is difficult to implement in routine clinical follow-up and sport field settings. Bioimpedance spectroscopy appears as a promising non-invasive, easy-to-use and transportable tool to assess indirect markers of muscle damage. The aim of this study was to determine whether bioimpedance spectroscopy data are sensitive to eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage and if these potential changes mirror responses in muscle function and tissue mechanical properties. Changes in knee extensors maximal isometric contraction torque, muscle soreness, resting rigidity of the quadriceps femoris muscle tissue, and bioimpedance parameters at rest and during maximal isometric contraction were assessed in nine healthy males before, immediately after and in the three days following 120 maximal isokinetic eccentric contractions. Maximal contraction torque was significantly reduced during the three days following the eccentric exercise (up to -24.2%) while muscle soreness and rigidity of the quadriceps femoris were elevated until the second day (+494.4% and +7.6%). Changes in bioimpedance spectroscopy parameters were transiently observed at rest immediately after the damaging exercise, but not in the days that followed. Although the changes in bioimpedance parameters correlated with that of the indirect markers of muscle damage, they had already returned to baseline while functional and mechanical impairments persisted. Therefore, bioimpedance spectroscopy measurements may represent a suitable and cost-effective means of monitoring muscle fatigue.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.8%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.6%
3
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
4
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
5
European Journal of Applied Physiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
8
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
9
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.8%
10
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
11
Skeletal Muscle
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
15
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
16
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
18
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
19
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Function
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
27
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
30
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%