Back

Impact of Imaging Protocols on Thermal Detection of Pressure Injuries: Threshold versus Deep Learning Across Skin Tones

Asare-Baiden, M.; Sonenblum, S. E.; Jordan, K.; Tomi John, G.; Chung, A.; Gichoya, J. W.; Hertzberg, V. S.; Ho, J. C.

2026-05-24 medical ethics
10.64898/2026.05.21.26353842 medRxiv
Show abstract

Pressure injuries represent a significant healthcare challenge requiring early detection to prevent severe complications. While thermal imaging shows promise for detecting early pressure-related temperature changes, its robustness across varying imaging conditions and diverse patient populations remains unclear. This study systematically evaluated how imaging protocol variations (lighting, distance, positioning, camera type) and participant skin tone influence classification model performance for thermal cooling detection. Using a controlled cooling protocol to simulate early pressure injury temperature changes, we collected 1,680 images from 35 diverse participants across 12 imaging protocol variations. We compared two approaches: three deep learning models (MobileNetV2, InceptionNetV3, ResNet50) and a threshold-based approach using an optimal fixed threshold temperature differential. Deep learning models outperformed the threshold-based approach, achieving 98.6-99.6% accuracy compared to 95.6%, with superior performance across all imaging protocols and skin tone groups. Threshold-based approach showed camera-dependent misclassification patterns across skin tones. On the high-resolution FLIR E8XT, the MST 7-10 group had 8 of 11 misclassifications. This pattern shifted on the low-resolution FLIR ONE Pro, where the intermediate skin tone group (MST 6) had 22 of 44 total misclassifications.In contrast, deep learning models maintained consistent performance across all skin tone groups and imaging protocols. Visualization analysis of the deep learning models suggested that these models focused on thermal gradients at cooling region boundaries, suggesting that spatial temperature gradients, not single-value thresholds, are critical for accurate detection. These findings suggest the potential of deep learning-based approaches to maintain robust, equitable performance across diverse skin tones and imaging conditions.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.1%
2
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.6%
3
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.1%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.3%
6
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.3%
7
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
3.0%
9
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
10
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.0%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.1%
12
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
15
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
17
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
18
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
19
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
20
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
21
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
22
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.6%
24
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%