Back

Patching the Leak or Rebuilding the Boat? Evaluating Targeted Probiotic Cyanobacteria and Microbiome Transplants to Counteract Rhizosphere Dysbiosis

Ketehouli, T.; Goss, E.; Perina, F.; Martins, S. J.

2026-05-21 microbiology
10.64898/2026.05.20.726701 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Antibiotic use in agricultural systems can unintentionally disrupt beneficial rhizosphere microorganisms, yet the consequences of this dysbiosis for plant fitness remain insufficiently understood. Building on previous findings that application of streptomycin to the roots decreases cyanobacteria and increases tomato plant susceptibility to foliar Xanthomonas infection, this study aimed to determine whether this relationship reflects causation or correlation. We evaluated whether targeted inoculation with the filamentous nitrogen-fixing cyanobacterium Cylindrospermum sp. (CI) or a complex rhizosphere microbiome transplant (RMT) could mitigate antibiotic-induced dysbiosis. As expected, streptomycin treatment significantly increased bacterial spot disease severity and reduced microbial richness in the rhizosphere, marked by a pronounced decline in cyanobacterial and Cylindrospermum operational taxonomic units. Co-occurrence network analysis revealed that this dysbiotic state was defined by reduced community connectivity and increased negative associations, indicating a breakdown in cooperative microbial relationships. Notably, both CI and RMT reduced plant disease severity, though they caused distinct rhizosphere community reassembly outcomes. While RMT relied on microbial functional redundancy, the targeted CI approach achieved more robust colonization and effectively "patched" the functional gap left by dysbiosis. Microbiome restoration directly influenced host physiology, significantly reducing the overactivation of ethylene-mediated defense genes, such as ERF1, and partially reinstating auxin-responsive signaling pathways (IAA21) that were disrupted under dysbiosis. These findings suggest that targeted microbial inoculation could reverse dysbiosis and enhance plant resilience under pathogen pressure as effectively as complex microbial transplants. This work highlights a shift in microbiome management: from the complex rebuilding of communities to the strategic repair of specific functional gaps.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Phytobiomes Journal
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
2
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
3
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.8%
4
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
5
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
6
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
7
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.8%
8
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
9
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.9%
11
Microbial Biotechnology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
12
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
13
Plant and Soil
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
15
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
16
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
19
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
20
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
21
Environmental Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
23
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
24
Microbiological Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
26
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
27
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
28
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Environmental Microbiology Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
30
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%