Back

Human CNS-3D organoids predict clinical seizure liability from calcium network activity

LaCroix, A. S.; Coungeris, N. S.; Alstat, V. K.; Rountree, C.; Botta, P.; Maaz, M.; Butt, C. M.

2026-05-23 pharmacology and toxicology
10.64898/2026.05.20.726675 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Drug-induced seizures remain a major safety concern in drug development, yet human seizure liability is difficult to predict using conventional preclinical models. Here, we evaluated whether spontaneous calcium network activity in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived CNS-3D Brain Organoids could predict clinically observed seizure risk across a pharmacokinetically anchored drug set. CNS-3D organoids contained neuronal and astrocytic populations, expressed neuroactive receptor and ion-channel gene programs that aligned with human cortical tissue, and exhibited reproducible spontaneous calcium oscillations across production batches. A retrospective drug panel of 66 small-molecule drugs was assembled from human clinical evidence, including 30 seizure-associated drugs and 36 comparator drugs without documented clinical seizure liability. Drugs were tested across concentration ranges anchored to reported clinical Cmax, and calcium time-series responses were integrated with chemical structure features using a machine-learning workflow. The final model predicted clinical seizure liability with an AUROC of 0.872, achieving 83.3% sensitivity and 88.9% specificity in drug-level cross-validation. Model scores also stratified seizure-associated drugs by clinical context and prevalence, suggesting that CNS-3D activity profiles capture clinically meaningful differences in seizure risk. Compared with published in vitro and preclinical seizure-liability models, CNS-3D organoid-based predictions showed improved balanced sensitivity and specificity. These findings support high-throughput calcium profiling in human CNS-3D organoids as a scalable, exposure-aware platform for predicting human seizure liability and contributing functional human data to neuro-safety assessment.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.6%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
3
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
5
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
6
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.0%
9
Epilepsia
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
10
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
12
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
14
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
15
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
16
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
21
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
22
Clinical and Translational Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
24
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
25
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.8%
27
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
28
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
30
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%