Vascular Deformation Mapping Calibration with Physics-based Synthetic Data on Multi-axial Aortic Motion
Kim, T.; Baker, T.; Burris, N.; Figueroa, A.
Show abstract
Aortic stiffness is both heterogenous and anisotropic. Current non-invasive methods to estimate aortic stiffness are limited to characterizing the aortic tissue as isotropic due to the lack the techniques required to extract multi-axial strain from 3D dynamic images. Vascular deformation mapping (VDM) is a nonrigid image registration technique which has thus far been applied to map aortic growth using longitudinal imaging. In this study, we propose to use VDM to assess 3D aortic deformation by mapping diastolic and systolic images. During image registration process, penalty parameters are employed to fine-tune image alignment and penalize non-physiological deformations. These penalty parameters must be calibrated to ensure that VDM successfully reproduces multi-axial aortic motion patterns in health and disease. In this paper, we developed a calibration pipeline for these parameters using synthetic data. A rotation-free shell model was used to generate physics-based synthetic data on aortic motion incorporating patient-specific geometries, root motion, and blood pressure from a cohort of 14 subjects (healthy, Marfans syndrome and thoracic aortic aneurysm). An error metric was defined to quantify the quality of the VDM results. Furthermore, a k-means clustering technique was used to categorize the subjects into three clusters based on ascending aortic motion. Optimal penalty parameters were identified for each of the three clusters. The results indicated that patient clusters with smaller aortic root motion required larger rigidity penalty values. The calibrated parameters successively reduced errors in 3D displacement and multi-axial stretch compared to un-optimized VDM predictions, enhancing the accuracy of capturing aortic deformation from dynamic images. Among the different aortic regions, the ascending thoracic aorta exhibits the largest error reduction.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.