Back

Vascular Deformation Mapping Calibration with Physics-based Synthetic Data on Multi-axial Aortic Motion

Kim, T.; Baker, T.; Burris, N.; Figueroa, A.

2026-05-22 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.05.20.726669 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Aortic stiffness is both heterogenous and anisotropic. Current non-invasive methods to estimate aortic stiffness are limited to characterizing the aortic tissue as isotropic due to the lack the techniques required to extract multi-axial strain from 3D dynamic images. Vascular deformation mapping (VDM) is a nonrigid image registration technique which has thus far been applied to map aortic growth using longitudinal imaging. In this study, we propose to use VDM to assess 3D aortic deformation by mapping diastolic and systolic images. During image registration process, penalty parameters are employed to fine-tune image alignment and penalize non-physiological deformations. These penalty parameters must be calibrated to ensure that VDM successfully reproduces multi-axial aortic motion patterns in health and disease. In this paper, we developed a calibration pipeline for these parameters using synthetic data. A rotation-free shell model was used to generate physics-based synthetic data on aortic motion incorporating patient-specific geometries, root motion, and blood pressure from a cohort of 14 subjects (healthy, Marfans syndrome and thoracic aortic aneurysm). An error metric was defined to quantify the quality of the VDM results. Furthermore, a k-means clustering technique was used to categorize the subjects into three clusters based on ascending aortic motion. Optimal penalty parameters were identified for each of the three clusters. The results indicated that patient clusters with smaller aortic root motion required larger rigidity penalty values. The calibrated parameters successively reduced errors in 3D displacement and multi-axial stretch compared to un-optimized VDM predictions, enhancing the accuracy of capturing aortic deformation from dynamic images. Among the different aortic regions, the ascending thoracic aorta exhibits the largest error reduction.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
2
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.3%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.7%
4
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.3%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
10
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
11
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
12
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
13
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
14
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
15
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
16
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
17
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
18
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
19
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
20
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
21
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
22
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
23
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
24
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
26
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
29
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.6%
30
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%