Back

Evolutionary Histories and Environments Shape Ugandan and Global Oral Microbiomes

Ademola-Popoola, I. J.; Grogen, K. E.; Abdul-Aziz, M. A.; Ta, C. K.; Tang, K.; Blekhman, R.; Barreiro, L. S.; Perry, G. H.; Weyrich, L. S.

2026-05-22 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.05.20.726600 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Industrialization has been identified as the single biggest factor driving global microbiome diversity. While many studies examining gut microbiomes attribute these shifts to dietary increases in fat and reductions in protein, oral microbiome responses to industrialization remains debated. The oral microbiome is more resilient due to long-standing coevolution with host tissues and biofilm stability. However, limited geographic and historical representation has constrained our understanding of how these transitions unfolded globally in the oral microbiomes. Here, we investigate oral microbiome variation in Batwa rainforest hunter-gatherers and neighboring Bakiga subsistence farmers from southwestern Uganda, comparing them with publicly available data from Tanzanian, Venezuelan, and industrialized populations from North America, Europe, and Australia. Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we characterized salivary microbiota and evaluated differences in local and global diversity, composition, and differential abundance. Ugandan populations contained significant compositional differences but similar levels of diversity, suggesting that shared environments and dietary overlap may shape microbial assemblages despite distinct cultural histories. Globally, strong continental and industrialization effects were observed in the oral microbiome, with all industrial populations clustering separately from people living in other locations. African populations also clustered separately from non-African groups. Oral microbiome diversity was highest in Ugandan individuals and lowest in industrialized populations, mirroring patterns previously observed in the gut microbiome. Together, these findings demonstrate that both geography and subsistence strategy structure global oral microbiome variation. They also clarify the position that oral microbial communities record biocultural transitions and highlight the need to better understand the industrial mechanisms that shape microbial diversity in the oral cavity.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.5%
2
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.4%
3
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.2%
5
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 14%
4.8%
7
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
9
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
10
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.6%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.1%
12
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
15
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
16
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.9%
17
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%
18
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Environmental Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
21
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
22
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.7%
24
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
25
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%