Back

Metabolic profiling and genome-scale modelling uncover mechanistic drivers of microbiome stability in synthetic maize root community

Krumbach, J.; Schoenherr, L.; Kroll, P.; Wewer, V.; Metzger, S.; Ischebeck, T.; Feierabend, M.; Toepfer, N.; Kopriva, S.; Jacoby, R. P.

2026-05-20 microbiology
10.64898/2026.05.20.726550 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Stability is a desirable property for agricultural microbiomes, but there is a poor understanding of the mechanisms that mediate microbial community stability. A representative bacterial synthetic community from maize roots has been proposed by Niu et al. (2017, PNAS, 114:E2450) as a model system to study microbiome stability. This SynCom assembles stably when all seven members are present, but community diversity collapses without the keystone E. ludwigii strain. In this study, we used complementary in vitro experiments and in silico metabolic modelling to assess the role of metabolites for the stability of this SynCom, by defining the metabolic niches occupied by each strain, as well as their cross-feeding phenotypes and B-vitamin dependencies. We show that the individual member strains occupy complementary metabolic niches, measured by the depletion of distinct metabolites in exometabolomic experiments, as well as contrasting growth phenotypes on diverse carbon substrates, patterns which are largely recapitulated by computational simulations. Minimal medium experiments show that the established seven-member community comprises a mixture of prototrophic and auxotrophic strains. Correspondingly, experimental and in silico cross-feeding phenotypes showed that spent media harvested from the prototrophic strains can sustain growth of two auxotrophs and let to the identification of B-vitamin dependencies. Altogether, this study highlights the complementary power of in vitro and in silico approaches and suggests that the metabolic mechanisms of this SynCom can serve as design principles to inform the rational assembly of stable plant-associated microbial communities.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.1%
2
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
10.3%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.0%
4
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.3%
5
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.7%
6
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.2%
8
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 10%
4.8%
9
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.9%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.9%
11
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.3%
12
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
13
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.0%
14
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.6%
15
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.3%
17
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
19
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.9%
20
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
21
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
22
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.6%
24
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%