Back

A competition-protection balance explains the evolution of resistance within simple microbial communities

Amicone, M.; Espinosa-Cantu, A.; Petrungaro, G.; Bollenbach, T.; Mitri, S.

2026-05-21 microbiology
10.64898/2026.05.20.726537 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Stressful environments can pose a threat to microbial populations, but resistant individuals can emerge and avoid extinction. Adaptation to stress is classically studied in isolated microbial species, ignoring ecological interactions, a key component of natural ecosystems. A growing body of experimental work has shown that community context can affect resistance evolution due to a large variety of mechanisms. Here we set out to identify the minimal components needed to predict the likelihood of acquiring resistance in a focal species embedded within a simple community. To achieve this, we developed a mathematical model based on evolutionary rescue theory and validated it with two experimental systems: Escherichia coli evolving on exposure to the antibiotic nitrofurantoin alone or with one of 14 bacterial isolates from urinary tract infections, and Microbacterium liquefaciens evolving in ampicillin alone or with ampicillin-degrading Comamonas testosteroni. One key factor that emerged from our analyses - the relative strength of competition versus protection - could explain whether a focal species is more or less likely to evolve resistance in the presence of a partner species. While competition always hinders the emergence of resistance, protection can rescue the focal species in two ways: (i) ecological rescue, when the partner species completely removes the antibiotic and favors the survival of the susceptible population, or (ii) evolutionary rescue, when the partner only lowers antibiotic concentrations and favors the emergence of resistant variants, a previously overlooked evolutionary consequence of detoxification. Overall, by integrating theory and experiments, we propose a framework that clarifies how ecological interactions favor or hinder the evolution of resistance to antibiotics or potentially other stressors. SignificanceBacteria can rapidly adapt to resist stressors, such as antibiotics. While resistance evolution in single populations or species is well understood, it remains unclear how ecological interactions with other species influence this process. We develop a mathematical framework to predict what interactions should favor resistance evolution and validate it with two sets of experiments where bacteria adapt to antibiotics in small communities. Our work demonstrates that interactions with other species shape the probability of evolving resistance in a predictable way, determined by the balance between competition and protection against the stressor. By identifying the key factors that drive these dynamics, our work helps explain how bacteria adapt to environmental challenges within species-rich ecosystems.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 3%
13.9%
2
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
9.8%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.6%
4
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
5
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.1%
7
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.2%
9
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.2%
10
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.8%
11
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
13
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.6%
15
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
16
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.6%
17
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
18
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.2%
20
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
21
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
24
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 38%
0.6%
28
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.6%
29
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
30
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%