Back

A phylogenetically informed comparative analysis of sexual testosterone dimorphism across mammals in relation to paternal care and sexual size dimorphism

Laubi, B. N.; Burkart, J. M.; Willems, E. P.; van Schaik, C. P.

2026-05-21 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.05.20.726499 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Within species, male testosterone is often linked to mating competition and paternal care, suggesting that sex differences in endogenous testosterone values across mammals may covary with broader reproductive strategies. Using a structured literature search, we compiled 63 studies, spanning 31 non-human species and 9 human populations, reporting endogenous, non-experimentally manipulated testosterone values for both adult males and females within the same population and context. From these studies, we calculated male-to-female testosterone ratios, and analysed these data using Bayesian phylogenetic multilevel models. We tested whether testosterone dimorphism was associated with paternal care and sexual size dimorphism while accounting for sampling matrix, assay method, breeding context, and wild versus captive setting. Across non-human mammals, neither paternal care nor sexual size dimorphism (indexing competition) showed a clear association with testosterone ratios, and the same pattern emerged in the primate-only subset. By contrast, sampling matrix was consistently associated with testosterone dimorphism across all analyses, with lower male-to-female ratios in non-blood than in blood-based measures. In primates, testosterone ratios were also lower in captive than in wild populations, although this pattern was not clearly supported in the broader non-human dataset. In the human-only analysis, testosterone ratios did not clearly differ between industrialized and small-scale societies, whereas the matrix effect remained evident. Overall, our results suggest that sampling matrix is a major source of variation even for ratio-based measures, highlighting the need for caution when inferring between-species endocrine differences from studies using different substrates. More broadly, directly comparable, non-experimentally manipulated testosterone data for both sexes remain rare across mammals, limiting comparative inference.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 5%
11.8%
2
Hormones and Behavior
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
3
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
8.0%
4
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.1%
5
Biology of Sex Differences
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.0%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.6%
7
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.6%
8
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.4%
10
General and Comparative Endocrinology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
12
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 26%
2.5%
14
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
15
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
16
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
17
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
19
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
21
Psychoneuroendocrinology
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
22
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
23
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
24
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
26
Evolutionary Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
27
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
28
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
29
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
30
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%