Back

Chromosome-scale genome assembly of diploid halophyte Thinopyrum bessarabicum excludes J genome from polyploid Thinopyrum ancestry

Walter, N.; Walker, J.; Yang, C.-y.; Scholefield, D.; Ashling, S.; Kaithakottil, G. G.; Swarbreck, D.; Sierra-Gonzalez, A.; Hawkins, K.; Atkinson, J.; Wells, D.; Hawkesford, M. J.; Niu, J.; Quiroz-Chavez, J.; Cavalet-Giora, E.; Krattinger, S. G.; Guo, W.; King, I. P.; King, J.; Grewal, S.

2026-05-21 plant biology
10.64898/2026.05.20.726494 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Wild relatives of wheat harbour genetic diversity essential for improving resilience to climate-driven stresses, yet their deployment is hampered by unresolved evolutionary relationships and the absence of reference genomes. Here we present a chromosome-scale reference genome for Thinopyrum bessarabicum, a diploid halophyte and high-priority donor for wheat salt tolerance breeding. A key unresolved question is whether the diploid J genome contributed directly to the subgenome composition of extant polyploid Thinopyrum species, and which genomic features underpin its exceptional salt tolerance. Using this resource, we show that the diploid J genome of Th. bessarabicum is not represented among the subgenomes of polyploid Thinopyrum species, resolving a long-standing ambiguity in Triticeae genomics. Gene-level resolution of the reciprocal 4/5 chromosomal translocation across six related Triticeae species identifies conserved breakpoint gene pairs, supporting a single ancestral rearrangement. Genome-wide gene content analysis shows that halophytic capacity is underpinned by quantitative expansion of conserved stress-response gene families. Salt tolerance phenotyping validates chromosome 5J as a tolerance locus in both Th. bessarabicum and wheat introgression lines. A physically anchored marker framework and dual-reference skim-sequencing pipeline enable precise megabase-resolution characterisation of Th. bessarabicum introgressions in wheat, providing a genomic foundation for deploying J-genome diversity in crop improvement.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
33.2%
2
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.2%
3
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.9%
4
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
6
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 14%
4.9%
8
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.6%
9
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
10
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
11
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.5%
12
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
15
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
16
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
Molecular Plant
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.9%
20
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
22
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
23
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
25
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.6%
26
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.5%
27
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%