Back

Affinity-tag-based microfluidic protein isolation enables high-resolution Cryo-EM from minimal starting material

Zimmermann, M.; Schneider, D. E.; Rima, L.; Clairfeuille, T.; Thoma, R.; Lauer, M.; Braun, T.

2026-05-21 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.05.20.726462 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cryo-EM has become central to high-resolution structure determination, but conventional sample preparation consumes substantial quantities of purified protein and relies on multi-step workflows that can destabilize sensitive complexes. Microfluidic approaches can downscale and accelerate these workflows while retaining the particle numbers required for single-particle analysis. Here, we present a generalized microfluidic isolation strategy that captures proteins directly from cell lysates or in vitro translation (IVT) reactions via genetically encoded tags rather than target-specific binders. Both affinity-based (ALFA-nanobody) and covalent (SpyTag3/SpyCatcher3) capture are supported. Specificity derives from two independent steps: (i) tag-mediated capture and concentration of the target on magnetically trapped beads, and (ii) photoelution of the bound protein from the bead surface. This suppresses non-specific carryover, a dominant concern at microfluidic surface-to-volume ratios. Using this approach, we isolated E. coli ferritin A, {beta}-galactosidase, and P. aeruginosa VgrG1 from less than 50 {micro}L of cell lysate or IVT reaction, obtaining reconstructions between 1.9 [A] and 2.6 [A] resolution with B-factors competitive with optimized conventional workflows. Tag-based microfluidic isolation thus provides a broadly applicable route to cryo-EM sample preparation, reducing sample volumes more than 1000-fold, shortening preparation times 3- to 10-fold, and enabling high-throughput structural screening from IVT reactions.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.