Back

Nutrient environments shape amino acid auxotrophy and cross-feeding

Baichman-Kass, A.; Noda-Garcia, L.; Friedman, J.

2026-05-21 ecology
10.64898/2026.05.20.726445 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Auxotrophy, the absence of biosynthetic capacity for essential metabolites, is widespread in microbes and is thought to shape interactions within communities. Auxotrophies are often treated as fixed properties of organisms; however, recent evidence indicates that auxotrophic phenotypes can depend on environmental context, thereby affecting community assembly or cross-feeding. Here, we systematically quantify how nutrient environments shape both auxotrophy and cross-feeding. Using matched sets of six amino acid auxotrophs in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, we measured monoculture and pairwise coculture growth across 40 carbon and nitrogen environments. We find that auxotrophy itself is highly environment dependent, with strains growing in a substantial fraction of amino acid-free conditions despite lacking key biosynthetic enzymes. Cross-feeding likewise varies widely across species, environments, and auxotroph pairs. Despite this variability, cross-feeding outcomes exhibit consistent patterns across species. In particular, cross-feeding growth is better predicted by auxotroph type (i.e., which amino acids the strain requires) than by environmental context. A machine-learning model recapitulates this pattern, identifying auxotroph type as the strongest predictor of cross-feeding growth, exceeding the contributions of nutrient environment, prototroph growth, and species identity. Together, these results show that environmental context reshapes both metabolic need and exchange, yet cross-feeding follows emergent patterns linked to auxotrophy. More broadly, our findings suggest that metabolic interdependence is shaped by both gene essentiality in an environmental context and intrinsic constraints of metabolic pathways, with implications for community assembly and the evolution of gene loss.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.