Back

CO2 fixation mediated by the carbon concentrating mechanism enables a rapid response to nitrogen deprivation in cyanobacteria

Saldivar, E. V.; Gershon, J.; Artier, J.; Tolleter, D.; Shih, P.; Rhee, S. Y.; Burlacot, A.

2026-05-22 plant biology
10.64898/2026.05.20.726413 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cyanobacteria are leading biomass producers of the ocean whose ecological success relies on their ability to respond to dynamic availability of nutrients like CO2 and nitrogen, which require distinct adaptive mechanisms. To survive nitrogen deprivation, cyanobacteria undergo a reversible transition to a dormant mode. Under low CO2 levels, a CO2 concentrating mechanism (CCM) supports their CO2 fixation. While the CCM and nitrogen assimilation have been shown to share some regulatory pathways, how the CCM impacts the response to nitrogen deprivation remains underexplored. In this study, by using mutants of the coastal cyanobacteria Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 lacking a CCM component, we show that the high rate of carbon fixation mediated by the CCM tunes the speed of the nitrogen deprivation response in {beta}-cyanobacteria. We first show that CCM mutants are deficient in inducing their typical nitrogen deprivation response under atmospheric CO2. However, at higher CO2 concentrations, the CCM mutants induce the nitrogen deprivation response. By combining Rubisco kinetics modeling with measurement of the response speed to nitrogen in various CO2 concentrations, we show that the speed of the nitrogen deprivation response increases linearly with Rubiscos carboxylation rate. We further reveal that the regulation of nitrogen response by the CCM is also present in the distantly related freshwater cyanobacteria Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942, suggesting a widespread role of this regulation across {beta}-cyanobacteria. This study demonstrates that CO2 fixation by the cyanobacterial CCM is a key regulator of the nitrogen deprivation response, favoring a rapid response to dynamic environments.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.8%
2
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.2%
3
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.1%
5
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 12%
4.2%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.8%
7
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.2%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.2%
10
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.8%
11
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.3%
14
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
15
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
16
Photosynthesis Research
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
17
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
19
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
20
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
22
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.5%
24
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
26
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%