Back

How Awakenings Shape Dream Recall: A Multilevel Study

Ataei, S.; Jafarzade Esfahani, M.; Axmacher, N.; Dresler, M.; Schoch, S. F.

2026-05-22 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.20.722678 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Dream recall varies substantially both between individuals and from night to night within the same individual. Although nocturnal awakenings are thought to facilitate the encoding and later retrieval of dream experiences, it remains unclear whether dream recall is shaped primarily by awakening frequency or by more specific awakening characteristics, including duration, sleep stage, and timing within the night. Here, we analyzed two cohorts: cohort 1 consisted of 708 adults spanning the full range of dream recall frequency, assessed across three waves with home sleep recordings and questionnaire-based dream recall frequency measures; cohort 2 consisted of 124 adults with high dream recall frequency, assessed across multiple nights with home sleep recordings and daily dream reports. Using multilevel models with within-between decomposition, we examined trait-like and state-like associations between awakening measures and dream recall outcomes. At the trait level, both questionnaire-based dream recall frequency in cohort 1 and daily dream recall (i.e., a sense of having dreamed) in cohort 2 were associated with a specific nocturnal awakening profile: more habitual long REM awakenings and short NREM awakenings, with REM awakening effects remaining robust after adjustment for sleep duration. At the state level, in cohort 2, nights with more short and medium REM awakenings than usual increased the likelihood of morning dream recall, whereas nights with more long REM awakenings than usual increased the likelihood of morning dream content recall (i.e., remembering dream content). These findings support the arousal-retrieval and functional state-shift models, while highlighting important nuances in the associations between nocturnal awakenings and different dream recall outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
22.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.9%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.3%
4
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.7%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 30%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.9%
7
SLEEP
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
8
Sleep
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.0%
9
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
11
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
12
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.9%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
14
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.6%
16
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
18
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
20
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
Sleep Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%