A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Preliminary Efficacy of PAL-CHW-PDAC, a Digitally Enhanced CHW-led Intervention to Facilitate Stepped Palliative Care in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.
Thiruvengadam, N.; Celestin-Joachim, M.; Rivas, L.; Bahmani, A.; Orosa, M.; Matangi, N.; Montgomery, S.; Ferrell, B.
Show abstract
Background Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma will be the 2nd-most common cause of cancer mortality by 2030. It is associated with rapid deterioration, severe symptoms, and significant quality-of-life concerns. Using input from patients, family caregivers (FCGs), and provider stakeholders, we designed an intervention, PAL-CHW-PDAC, delivered by a community health worker that involves proactive symptom monitoring and management, care navigation, and disease education. Methods We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial of 60 patients with newly diagnosed PDAC (within 2 weeks of diagnosis) and their caregivers at Loma Linda University Health from 09/2025 to 05/2026. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive the PAL-CHW-PDAC intervention (6 CHW visits over 3 months) or an attention control. The control comparator involved receiving standard handouts and videos on pancreatic cancer, along with check-in visits with research staff. The primary outcome was symptom burden, defined using the NCCN/FACT Hepatobiliary Symptom Index. Secondary outcomes included quality of life (QoL) measured by the FACT-Hep and psychological distress (measured by the NCCN-Distress Thermometer). Caregiver outcomes included burden, preparedness, quality of life, and psychological distress. Results: 60 out of 74 eligible (81%) were enrolled. The median age was 71, 60% of patients were Hispanic. 68% of patients presented with metastatic PDAC, 23% with borderline resectable disease and 9% with resectable PDAC. There was a trend towards improved symptom burden at 12 weeks (mean increase of 5.3 points vs. decrease of 3.2 points; p=0.093) with the intervention compared to the attention control. The intervention group also had improved psychological distress at 12 weeks (3.31 vs. 5.95, p=0.01), caregiver psychological distress (3.26 vs. 6.86, p<0.001) and caregiver preparedness (2.92 vs. 2.11) at 12 weeks. Telehealth utilization for symptom-focused visits improved with the intervention (82%) compared to the control. (14%, p=0.01) Hospice utilization also improved with the intervention (41% vs 7%, p-0.12). Conclusions: A pilot RCT of the PAL-CHW-PDAC intervention demonstrated preliminary efficacy with a trend towards improved symptom burden, psychological distress, and caregiver psychological distress and preparedness. A larger definitive clinical trial is needed to understand the impact of this promising intervention. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT07591571
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Core Outcome Set to evaluate the impact of prognostication in people living with advanced cancer: an international consensus study 94%
- Study Protocol: LIAM Mc Trial (Linking In with Advice and supports for Men impacted by Metastatic cancer) 93%
- Do people with disabilities experience disparities in cancer care? A systematic review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Models, components, and outcomes of palliative and end-of-life care provided to adults living at home: A systematic review of reviews 91%
- Response and role of palliative care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national telephone survey of hospices in Italy 90%
- Defining and measuring unmet palliative care needs among people with life-limiting illness: a scoping review of international evidence 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Addressing the Needs and Identifying Supports for Parents of Chronically Ill Adolescents and Young Adults in their Shared Transition from Pediatric to Adult Care: A Scoping Review Protocol 92%
- The impact of patient-centered care on quality of life and hope among patients receiving home medical care: The Zaitaku Evaluative Initiatives and Outcome Study 92%
- Psychological Impact of the Galleri Test (sIG(n)al): Protocol for a longitudinal evaluation of the psychological impact of receiving a cancer signal in the NHS-Galleri Trial 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of digital-enabled multidisciplinary therapy conferences on efficiency and quality of the decision making in prostate-cancer care 89%
- User Testing of a Diagnostic Decision Support System with Machine-assisted Chart Review to Facilitate Clinical Genomic Diagnosis 87%
- Measures of socioeconomic advantage are not independent predictors of support for healthcare AI: subgroup analysis of a national Australian survey 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accuracy of Medical Billing Data Against the Electronic Health Record in the Measurement of Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates 89%
- A mixed methods study of attitudes on location of gynaecological oncology outpatient care: a patient and healthcare professional questionnaire 88%
- An observational study of survival outcomes of people referred for ‘fast-track’ end-of-life care funding in a District General Hospital; too little too late? 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.