An independent, multi-timepoint evaluation of Disconnection Symptom Discoverer cognitive outcome prediction accuracy in stroke
Kenny, L.; Moore, M.; Demeyere, N.
Show abstract
The Disconnection Symptom Discoverer (DSD) model proposes to predict long-term performance on neuropsychological tests from stroke lesion disconnection profiles. The model requires external validation to determine reproducibility and generalizability to new and different patients. Here, we investigated whether the DSD supports accurate multi-domain cognitive outcome predictions at three different timepoints post stroke, in a clinically representative independent cohort. In this study, the DSD was used to predict visuospatial attention, verbal memory, and language scores in an independent cohort of 74 stroke survivors (mean age = 69.2, 39% female) with 3 repeated cognitive assessments. DSD-predicted scores were compared to observed neuropsychological scores collected at <2 weeks, six months, and > 2 years post-stroke. DSD-predicted language outcomes were significantly correlated with observed behaviour at the <2 weeks timepoint, but no other significant correlations between DSD-predicted scores were identified. Importantly, DSD-predicted verbal memory and visuospatial domain scores were not significantly correlated with observed behaviour at any of the considered timepoints (minimum p-value = 0.33). Across all tests and timepoints, DSD-predicted scores had an average Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.21 (SD = 0.13, range = 0.04-0.43), with the highest errors occurring between predicted and observed memory scores. Larger stroke lesions were associated with higher MAE, indicating that the DSD performance was modulated by stroke severity. Overall, these results indicate that the DSD did not yield informative predictions of long-term cognitive outcomes in this external dataset. This finding provides an important illustration of potential overfitting issues within cognitive outcome prediction models, highlighting the need for caution when aiming to predict long-term post-stroke cognitive outcomes and further external validation of proposed models.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal trajectories of global and domain-specific cognition after stroke using the Oxford Cognitive Screen 96%
- Blood-brain barrier leakage in the penumbra is associated with infarction on follow-up imaging in acute ischemic stroke 93%
- Predicting outcome after newborn stroke: A lesion network mapping study leveraging large-scale data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lesions in putative language and attention regions are linked to more severe strokes in patients with higher white matter hyperintensity burden 95%
- White matter hyperintensities modify relationships between corticospinal tract damage and motor outcomes after stroke 94%
- Boston criteria v2.0 for cerebral amyloid angiopathy without hemorrhage: An MRI-neuropathological validation study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Left Hemisphere Bias of NIH Stroke Scale is Most Severe for Middle Cerebral Artery Strokes 94%
- Preliminary outcomes of combined treadmill and overground high-intensity interval training in ambulatory chronic stroke 94%
- Towards individualized Medicine in Stroke – the TiMeS project: protocol of longitudinal, multi-modal, multi-domain study in stroke 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.