Back

An independent, multi-timepoint evaluation of Disconnection Symptom Discoverer cognitive outcome prediction accuracy in stroke

Kenny, L.; Moore, M.; Demeyere, N.

2026-05-22 neurology
10.64898/2026.05.20.26353733 medRxiv
Show abstract

The Disconnection Symptom Discoverer (DSD) model proposes to predict long-term performance on neuropsychological tests from stroke lesion disconnection profiles. The model requires external validation to determine reproducibility and generalizability to new and different patients. Here, we investigated whether the DSD supports accurate multi-domain cognitive outcome predictions at three different timepoints post stroke, in a clinically representative independent cohort. In this study, the DSD was used to predict visuospatial attention, verbal memory, and language scores in an independent cohort of 74 stroke survivors (mean age = 69.2, 39% female) with 3 repeated cognitive assessments. DSD-predicted scores were compared to observed neuropsychological scores collected at <2 weeks, six months, and > 2 years post-stroke. DSD-predicted language outcomes were significantly correlated with observed behaviour at the <2 weeks timepoint, but no other significant correlations between DSD-predicted scores were identified. Importantly, DSD-predicted verbal memory and visuospatial domain scores were not significantly correlated with observed behaviour at any of the considered timepoints (minimum p-value = 0.33). Across all tests and timepoints, DSD-predicted scores had an average Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.21 (SD = 0.13, range = 0.04-0.43), with the highest errors occurring between predicted and observed memory scores. Larger stroke lesions were associated with higher MAE, indicating that the DSD performance was modulated by stroke severity. Overall, these results indicate that the DSD did not yield informative predictions of long-term cognitive outcomes in this external dataset. This finding provides an important illustration of potential overfitting issues within cognitive outcome prediction models, highlighting the need for caution when aiming to predict long-term post-stroke cognitive outcomes and further external validation of proposed models.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.2%
2
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
8.0%
4
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.7%
5
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.2%
6
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
7
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
10
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.5%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
18
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
23
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
26
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
27
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
29
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%