Back

Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Attention-Based Rehabilitation for Functional Neurological Disorder

Palmer, D. D. G.; Palmer, S.; Darracott, B.; Stone, K.

2026-05-22 neurology
10.64898/2026.05.20.26353701 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction Functional neurological disorder (FND) is a common cause of neurological disability and is associated with substantial healthcare utilisation and cost. Most available treatments target specific symptom subtypes, and prospective evidence regarding the effect of treatment on health-system costs remains limited. We evaluated the real-world clinical and economic outcomes of a transdiagnostic outpatient intervention, attention-based rehabilitation (ABR). Methods We conducted a pragmatic waitlist-controlled study in 54 consecutively referred patients with neurologist-diagnosed FND attending a specialist outpatient service. Clinical outcomes--including quality of life (Short Form-36), social and occupational participation (Work and Social Adjustment Scale), symptom severity, and mental health (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)--were assessed at waitlist entry, treatment commencement, treatment completion, and 6 and 12 months post-treatment. Healthcare utilisation and costs were obtained prospectively from health-service financial records for the 6 months preceding treatment, the treatment period, and two consecutive 6-month post-treatment periods. Longitudinal clinical outcomes and healthcare costs were analysed using Bayesian mixed-effects and mixture models, respectively. Results All clinical measures remained stable or worsened during the waitlist control period. Across treatment, six of eight SF-36 domains, WSAS, employment status, and both HADS subdomains improved, with maintenance through 12 months. Patient-reported symptom improvement persisted post-treatment. Expected monthly health system costs approximately halved post-treatment, with net cost savings by approximately 50 days. Conclusion A fixed-duration, symptom-agnostic outpatient ABR programme was associated with durable improvements in functioning and quality of life, alongside substantial reductions in healthcare utilisation and cost, supporting scalable symptom-agnostic treatment models for FND.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
2
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.4%
4
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
5
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
8
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
11
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.7%
20
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
21
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
22
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
23
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
24
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
27
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
28
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
30
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%