Back

Assessing the Impact of Interventions on Tuberculosis Control: India Based Modelling Framework

Raj, Y. A.; Parthasarathy, R.; Mitra, M. K.; Mehra, S.

2026-05-22 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.05.20.26353466 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background India accounts for nearly one-fourth of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden. The country's progress towards elimination of TB is hindered by considerable heterogeneity in behavioural, social, and health system determinants, which influence transmission dynamics and care access. Evidence from the recent national TB prevalence survey showed that almost half of individuals with active disease were asymptomatic, underscoring the limitations of symptom -based case finding. Achieving the End TB targets will therefore require strategies that simultaneously address the substantial pool of individuals with undiagnosed, asymptomatic disease and those symptomatic individuals who do not seek care. Methods We developed a transmission model of TB that explicitly incorporates individuals with asymptomatic disease, and those who do not seek care. Model calibration was performed within a Bayesian framework using epidemiological and programmatic data for India. The calibrated model was then used to project the potential impact of intervention on TB incidence and mortality. Results Under the baseline scenario, the estimated TB incidence and mortality rates for 2024 were 180 (163-203) and 24 (18-31) per 100,000 population, respectively. Across all intervention scenarios targeting improved diagnosis, active case finding, nutrition support and their combination the reduction in incidence rate by 2030 ranged from 13% to 60% compared with 2025, while the corresponding decline in mortality rate ranged from 16% to 66%. Conclusion While individual interventions yield measurable reductions in TB incidence and mortality, but greater impact is achieved when implemented in combination reflecting the need for a comprehensive, multi-component response towards TB elimination.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.6%
2
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
10.5%
3
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.4%
5
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
6
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
8
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
10
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
12
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
16
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
20
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.8%
25
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
29
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
30
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%