Personalized Brain-Based Analgesia Detection with Portable fNIRS and AI

Neuroimaging based pain decoding faces two underappreciated challenges: between subject variability that prevents classifiers from generalizing across patients, and within session cross validation designs that inflate reported accuracy by conflating within person and between person variance. Here we address both using portable functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) during pharmacologically verified local nerve anesthesia. Twentyfive patients with clinically painful teeth underwent 36 channel bilateral fNIRS during percussion before ("Pre") and after ("Post") local nerve anesthesia. In 13 block-success patients, a paired Pre versus Post comparison with healthy tooth control identified three temporal hemodynamic response function (HRF) features (late slope, mean first derivative, and baseline normalized amplitude) whose analgesia interaction effects (d = 0.63 to 0.79) exceeded that of raw general linear model (GLM) amplitude (d = 0.56), with a significant difference-in-differences interaction (p = 0.011). Per-patient calibration with these features yielded leave one subject out (LOSO) AUC = 0.68 to 0.76 for nonlinear classifiers (permutation p = 0.002), with HbO-specific feature selection achieving the best performance (RF AUC = 0.760); a healthy tooth negative control was non-significant. End to end deep learning on raw time series (CNN LSTM AUC = 0.719) was competitive with feature based classifiers, while linear models did not reach significance. Critically, head to head comparison of within-session CV and LOSO on the same data revealed mean inflation of +0.13 AUC across all model types, including deep learning, demonstrating that high within session accuracy alone does not establish subject-independent validity. Exploratory analyses suggested complementary roles for oxyhemoglobin (HbO; within patient analgesia detection) and deoxyhemoglobin (HbR; cross patient information), and that trial to trial response variability may complement amplitude for cross patient pain detection. These results show that per patient calibration with temporal HRF features supports subject independent analgesic-state detection under strict LOSO evaluation, and that within-session validation (standard in the fNIRS pain- decoding literature) can substantially overestimate performance.