Back

Geographical targeting of active case finding for tuberculosis in Pakistan using artificial intelligence software (SPOT-TB): a pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomized control trial.

Mahfooz, A.; Latif, A.; Zaidi, S. M. A.; Ahmed, W.; Nawaz, N.; Reza, T. E.; Tahir, A.; Ur Rehman, F.; Naveed, S.; Shahid, A.; Ali, F.; Emmanuel, F.

2026-05-22 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.05.20.26348577 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Community-wide active case-finding (ACF) is being increasingly implemented as a tuberculosis (TB) elimination intervention. However, conventional site selection strategies may result in low yields from screening. We evaluated whether an artificial intelligence (AI) software guided targeting strategy could improve detection of TB during screening activities (called camps) relative to routine approaches to site selection in the programmatic setting in Pakistan. Methods We conducted a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial embedded within Global Fund supported ACF activities implemented by Pakistan s National TB Program and private sector partners. Thirty mobile X-ray van teams operating in 68 districts were randomly assigned to transition from routine site selection approaches (based on field-staff experience and historical data) to an AI-guided targeting strategy, using the software MATCH-AI. We assessed the effect of the intervention on the primary outcome, Camp Positivity Yield, defined as the number of individuals diagnosed with bacteriologically confirmed TB per camp, using generalised linear mixed models. The primary analysis was by intention to treat. Camps conducted within a 5-km radius of the AI selected locations were included in a validated per-protocol analysis. We conducted several district-level subgroup analyses. This trial is registered, number NCT06017843. Findings Between August 2023 and September 2024, 3,936 screening camps were conducted (2,046 control, 1,890 intervention), screening 269,254 individuals. In the intention-to-treat analysis, Camp Positivity Yield was 7% higher in the intervention group relative to the control group, however this difference was not statistically significant (adjusted risk ratio [RR] 1.07, 95% CI: 0.94 -1.22). In the validated per-protocol analysis, Camp Positivity Yield was 32% higher in the intervention group relative to the control group (adjusted RR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.12-1.54). Yields were highest in districts that had moderate baseline yields of 0.5-1% per population screened prior to the trial (adjusted RR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.13 - 2.18) and in rural districts (adjusted RR 1.43, 95% CI: 1.23 -1.65). Interpretation The use of an AI-guided targeting strategy significantly increased detection of bacteriologically confirmed TB during active case-finding in the validated per-protocol analysis, relative to conventional site-selection approaches employed by field-staff. This software may be considered as a supportive tool to improve the efficiency of community-based TB case-finding interventions in other high burden countries.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
2
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.0%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.4%
4
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.4%
5
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
6
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.3%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.7%
10
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
11
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
12
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
13
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
14
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
15
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
16
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
17
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
19
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
20
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
22
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
24
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
25
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
27
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%