Back

Pathogen virulence does not alter antibiotic efficacy under growth-matched in vivo conditions

Wolff Bengtsen, V.; Hüussler, S.; Roghanian, M.

2026-05-21 microbiology
10.64898/2026.05.19.726418 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Whether pathogen virulence influences antibiotic efficacy independently of bacterial growth dynamics has not been directly tested under controlled in vivo conditions. Here, we used the Galleria mellonella larval infection model to address this question. We first compared Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Staphylococcus aureus across a wide range of inoculum sizes, revealing pronounced pathogen-specific differences in virulence. Despite these differences, all pathogens followed a similar infection trajectory characterised by an initial reduction in bacterial burden followed by successful proliferation within the host. Focusing on P. aeruginosa and E. coli, which differ markedly in virulence but display comparable in vivo growth rates (doubling times of approximately 30 minutes), we assessed antibiotic efficacy under experimentally controlled, growth-matched conditions. Treatment with ciprofloxacin or gentamicin at defined multiples of the MIC reduced bacterial loads, prevented host death, and cleared infections to an indistinguishable extent for both pathogens. These findings demonstrate that pathogen virulence does not determine antibiotic efficacy when bacterial growth is comparable in vivo, and support the predictive value of MIC-based susceptibility testing during active infection.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 2%
23.1%
2
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.8%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.3%
4
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
6
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 27%
2.1%
8
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
9
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
10
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
11
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.4%
12
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
13
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.3%
15
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
18
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
19
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Gut Microbes
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
24
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
27
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
28
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%
29
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
30
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%